Quote (Kayeto @ Apr 10 2021 09:49pm)
The fact that people take issue with how those cops acted on that video serves as evidence that we can never have productive cultural discussion about this situation.
Some extremists will never be happy unless the cops have carte blanche. Opposing extremists think that cops should need to be 100% perfect in their words and actions all the time in order to be acceptable. Neither extreme is ever going to become reality. Therefore, the only productive discussion is one that excludes supporters of both extreme viewpoints.
I don't think we need to cater to extremists though. Cops are put into some tough situations sometimes. Sometimes those situations are unwinnable and they have to take the least bad option.
This is a situation where the cop just doesn't have what it takes to be a good cop though. You can't just assault people when you're having a bad day. Given that you're in a position of authority, you should face the maximum sentence that a civilian would face if they did that.
Quote (Kayeto @ Apr 10 2021 10:32pm)
This is a perfect example of what I mean. The video clearly shows that the cops gave the driver ample opportunity to cooperate. He opted not to cooperate despite these opportunities. Yet you look at the video and describe him as "cooperating".
It's impossible to engage in discussion if people are unwilling to acknowledge clear evidence.
How can you cooperate when you are given conflicting commands?
This post was edited by thundercock on Apr 10 2021 11:37pm