congress should write laws period. they dont hardly do anything.

This’ll swing back around to bite him in the ass.

/e wrong thread

This post was edited by Goomshill on May 28 2020 12:07pm

Ikr

How is this a bad thing? Social media companies can opt into acting as a publisher then do as they see fit, and accept the responsibility. Or, they can continue doing what they do with the exception of not censoring people for holding differing viewpoints.

trump is big government.

trump is EVERYTHING the R claims to hate.. yet here are all the trolls supporting him..
If i owned twitter i would ban him and start the legal battle.
he is such a total loser in the middle of the COVID crisis' he cares about fact checks on twitter*
STOP calling it censorship. Its so far from that.

That's incredibly difficult to do with any law that could potentially violate the First Amendment. To challenge EO at the SCOTUS level, first you have to be sure the law itself can't be overturned by the SCOTUS.

Just throwing that out there.

Well that would have no bearing on what happened that prompted the executive order. Some one would have to have been censored for that to apply.

It's too bad that in do this when he said Obama was Kenyan and a secret Muslim.

Let me add.. an honest person wouldn't react to this..
they could say.. "cool independent source verifies my statements" could be a campaign tool. Obviously trump KNOWS he lies. So much for the Rough around the edges lens