Quote (eMptyBox @ May 6 2020 12:52pm)
they call it a virus because when isolated with a cell(petri dish) when the cell dies (obv cant live in that environment) the protein is all thats left so they claim its the disease (really the cell was trying to cleanse itself via solvents)
these proteins(viruses) do exists, just as biproduct of the cell(s). NOT AN EXTERNAL HIJACKER VICTIM MIND
thats the difference.
Two observations that directly conflict with this (my personal observations, observations that directly lead to the discovery of viruses, and observations that are replicated daily in hundreds of labs around the world)
1. If we take a very small amount of the media the viral infected cells were growing in and place it in a new flask of cells that are growing fine, those new cells will die while increasing the concentration of viral particles.
2. Those viral particles contain DNA or RNA that has been sequenced, and we have sequenced the human genome and found that those sequences don't have overlap. Similarly we can detect for viral proteins and we have found that the viral proteins don't exist naturally in those cells.
So we see from these two observations that
1. The viral particles are deadly in very small amounts
2. The viral particles are replicated in the presences of cells while killing the cells.
3. The viral particles contain DNA and proteins that were not previously present in the infected cells.
From this we can conclude that viral particles exist, are infectious, and aren't a natural part of cells.
This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 6 2020 02:20pm