d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Covid-19 And The Flu
Prev12348Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 205,228
Joined: Sep 13 2010
Gold: 0.00
Apr 26 2020 09:04am
Quote (Melatonina @ Apr 26 2020 03:58am)
illuminatis remove your link the same day they removed scientifical evidence for urine drinking benefits bro


More like the synagogue of EL

But yeah same thing, way to have an open mind
Member
Posts: 351
Joined: Mar 24 2020
Gold: 1,850.59
May 3 2020 07:37am
they are saying its going to come back again stronger to me it seems a little skeptical to be thinking that
Member
Posts: 205,228
Joined: Sep 13 2010
Gold: 0.00
May 3 2020 08:46am
Quote (EzRekt @ May 3 2020 07:37am)
they are saying its going to come back again stronger to me it seems a little skeptical to be thinking that


Ofc wave two,

Creating the demand of "more testing" when historically the tests/vaccines cause the sickness

But people would rather believe only good is involved :lol:
Member
Posts: 23,818
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
May 4 2020 02:31pm
possible due to recombination apparently
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8439/

Much like Thor said
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
May 4 2020 04:01pm
I find it hilarious that people say viruses don't exist.

I use viruses every month or so in my job when we need to transform cells. Like if we want to insert a gene to make living cells express a red dye so we can count them and measure growth, we use a lentivirus that was purified and modified. Similarly a lab we occasionally collaborate with is a virology lab that has isolated viruses, has determined their protein structure, has recorded their genetic code, etc. etc. You should be at some of our floor meetings too. These researchers love ripping each others data apart if they make an unsupported claim, or if they just make a claim using a method that isn't appropriate.

The idea that there is a conspiracy is just nonsense if you have any experience doing actual science. These guys are ruthless and will eat their own in a heartbeat if they see poor evidence being presented.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 4 2020 04:01pm
Member
Posts: 205,228
Joined: Sep 13 2010
Gold: 0.00
May 6 2020 11:52am
they call it a virus because when isolated with a cell(petri dish) when the cell dies (obv cant live in that environment) the protein is all thats left so they claim its the disease (really the cell was trying to cleanse itself via solvents)

these proteins(viruses) do exists, just as biproduct of the cell(s). NOT AN EXTERNAL HIJACKER VICTIM MIND

thats the difference.

This post was edited by eMptyBox on May 6 2020 11:55am
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
May 6 2020 02:18pm
Quote (eMptyBox @ May 6 2020 12:52pm)
they call it a virus because when isolated with a cell(petri dish) when the cell dies (obv cant live in that environment) the protein is all thats left so they claim its the disease (really the cell was trying to cleanse itself via solvents)

these proteins(viruses) do exists, just as biproduct of the cell(s). NOT AN EXTERNAL HIJACKER VICTIM MIND

thats the difference.


Two observations that directly conflict with this (my personal observations, observations that directly lead to the discovery of viruses, and observations that are replicated daily in hundreds of labs around the world)

1. If we take a very small amount of the media the viral infected cells were growing in and place it in a new flask of cells that are growing fine, those new cells will die while increasing the concentration of viral particles.
2. Those viral particles contain DNA or RNA that has been sequenced, and we have sequenced the human genome and found that those sequences don't have overlap. Similarly we can detect for viral proteins and we have found that the viral proteins don't exist naturally in those cells.

So we see from these two observations that
1. The viral particles are deadly in very small amounts
2. The viral particles are replicated in the presences of cells while killing the cells.
3. The viral particles contain DNA and proteins that were not previously present in the infected cells.


From this we can conclude that viral particles exist, are infectious, and aren't a natural part of cells.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 6 2020 02:20pm
Member
Posts: 205,228
Joined: Sep 13 2010
Gold: 0.00
May 6 2020 02:21pm
viral particles are created from the cells sophisticated defense, it has over 300k diferent types of "Viruses" built in it...

they arent replicated in presences of cells. they are biproducts...

the proteins are results of it trying to cleanse itself


still didnt prove anything
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
May 6 2020 02:24pm
Quote (eMptyBox @ May 6 2020 03:21pm)
viral particles are created from the cells sophisticated defense, it has over 300k diferent types of "Viruses" built in it...

they arent replicated in presences of cells. they are biproducts...

the proteins are results of it trying to cleanse itself

still didnt prove anything


If it was a natural part of cells defense then we wouldn't see a new viral genome appear. We do genome sequencing of our cells as standard practice, and we never see these viral genomes show up unless we purposefully infect the cells with viral particles.

Additionally, we can test these "viral infected" cell cultures for mycoplasm, fungus, bacteria, and pretty much everything, which again, we do regularly as standard practice. We don't see anything the cells need to be defending themselves from, and we can maintain these cells for literal years on end in culture without issue.

Also, we can purify the viral particles so we know there aren't any other contaminants, and when we add them to a perfectly healthy cell culture they will start to die and increase the amount of viral particles.


So again, we have proven they aren't natural (they show up nowhere in the genome or proteome beforehand) they are infectious (the cells are fine until we add the viral particles), and they use cells to replicate (we only see an increase in viral particles in the presence of cells, and again we have proven they aren't a natural part of the cells)

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 6 2020 02:34pm
Member
Posts: 205,228
Joined: Sep 13 2010
Gold: 0.00
May 6 2020 02:32pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 6 2020 02:24pm)
If it was a natural part of cells defense then we wouldn't see a new viral genome appear. We do genome sequencing of our cells as standard practice, and we never see these viral genomes show up unless we purposefully infect the cells with viral particles.


New 5g, must defend, aka new proteins.. pretty obvious
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev12348Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll