d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Joe Biden 2020 Thread
Prev18028038048058061009Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 45,878
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,189.49
Jan 24 2022 09:34am
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/24/politics/supreme-court-harvard-unc-affirmative-action/index.html

When Joe Biden took office, one of his early action was to suspend the AG's legal push to end discrimination in applications at colleges, particularly against asians but also whites.
This was initiated under Trump, with revelations like how Harvard was directly weighting point scores on SAT/ACTs based on race, -250 for asians
Now despite Biden's efforts to quash it, the privately brought case by Students for Fair Admissions, which initiated their lawsuit in 2014, has finally reached the supreme court who agreed to hear arguments in the october 2022 docket, decision likely by june 2023 - over the objections of Biden's DoJ who argued the high court should let it pass.

Give the 6-3 split in the supreme court and the fact John Roberts has already repeatedly sided against institutionalized discrimination, especially direct racial weighting in education, makes it very likely to get struck down and the lower courts reversed, unless SCOTUS dodges on technical grounds. Could be a 6-3 or 7-2, I mean you sure know which way Clarence Thomas will go lmao

Quote
Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Scalia joins as to Parts I—VII, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Frederick Douglass, speaking to a group of abolitionists almost 140 years ago, delivered a message lost on today’s majority:

n regard to the colored people, there is always more that is benevolent, I perceive, than just, manifested towards us. What I ask for the negro is not benevolence, not pity, not sympathy, but simply justice. The American people have always been anxious to know what they shall do with us… . I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! … And if the negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone! … [Y]our interference is doing him positive injury.” What the Black Man Wants: An Address Delivered in Boston, Massachusetts, on 26 January 1865, reprinted in 4 The Frederick Douglass Papers 59, 68 (J. Blassingame & J. McKivigan eds. 1991) (emphasis in original).
Member
Posts: 66,069
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 24 2022 09:53am
Quote (Goomshill @ 24 Jan 2022 15:34)
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/24/politics/supreme-court-harvard-unc-affirmative-action/index.html

When Joe Biden took office, one of his early action was to suspend the AG's legal push to end discrimination in applications at colleges, particularly against asians but also whites.
This was initiated under Trump, with revelations like how Harvard was directly weighting point scores on SAT/ACTs based on race, -250 for asians
Now despite Biden's efforts to quash it, the privately brought case by Students for Fair Admissions, which initiated their lawsuit in 2014, has finally reached the supreme court who agreed to hear arguments in the october 2022 docket, decision likely by june 2023 - over the objections of Biden's DoJ who argued the high court should let it pass.

Give the 6-3 split in the supreme court and the fact John Roberts has already repeatedly sided against institutionalized discrimination, especially direct racial weighting in education, makes it very likely to get struck down and the lower courts reversed, unless SCOTUS dodges on technical grounds. Could be a 6-3 or 7-2, I mean you sure know which way Clarence Thomas will go lmao


Forgot Jew-Asian connection: 3000% over-presentation IMO.
Member
Posts: 53,139
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 24 2022 09:54am


ffs..

stock market tanking
crypto markets rugging
inflation out of control
job market fubar
begging opec+ russia for oil
more dead from covid with vaccines and boosters than prior administration in same time frame
russia given green light to invade ukraine

well done harris/biden administration
Member
Posts: 45,878
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,189.49
Jan 24 2022 02:48pm
https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-environment-lakes-pollution-water-pollution-31034c1d9df1a63cc0841b29ac7a3fe1

I'm sure this instantly zones out anyone who doesn't follow this kind of bureaucracy wonk stuff like I do since I know too much about civil engineering, but WOTUS is back on the menu at SCOTUS
supreme court will revisit the clean water act that it left in limbo with its last 4-4-1 ruling in Rapanos v US in 2006.
all it really asks is who has authority over ephemeral waterways under the 'navigable water' term in the law- states or federal authorities
democrats want the feds to get control of pretty much every water in america, anything that flows into any other water that flows into a navigable water, the 'significant nexus' interpretation
republicans want states to have control of everything but the major rivers, basically
obama tried to push that significant nexus version in 2015 based on the sole dissent in that 4-4-1 decision, and got indefinitely held up in the courts from 2015 to 2018, when the supreme court ruled appeals courts didn't have authority to issue a stay, and returned it to district courts, but trump formally repealed the obama interpretation at the same time, which itself was then stayed by the district courts last august, which left it one again in its perpetual state of limbo, and Biden has since declared that he plans to fully reverse the Trump interpretation at some unspecified point in the future- hasn't happened yet- but didn't actually say if he plans to restore the Obama version.

Anyway, this is the supreme court's chance to actually settle the issue for good.
Back in 2006, it was Scalia / Roberts / Thomas / Alito (states) vs Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (hardcore feds) vs Kennedy (feds but watered down)
In the current court, that leaves Roberts / Thomas / Alito clearly aligned with states, Breyer clearly aligned with feds, and we can assume Gorsuch / Kavanaugh / Barrett align with states and its guaranteed that Sotomayor / Kagan align with whatever the democrats support, so that would make it a true 6-3 decision since Roberts already came down cleanly on the conservative side last time and doesn't have any stare decisis issues with a previous indecisive decision
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Jan 24 2022 03:35pm
Crypto is mary kay for young white guys.
Member
Posts: 53,139
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 24 2022 04:25pm
Quote (Skinned @ 24 Jan 2022 16:35)
Crypto is mary kay for young white guys.


plenty of brown yellow red tan and black people of all genders made money off crypto. sadly an old white guy that you 100% support no matter what wants to overregulate it to kingdom come, because he is a lifelong segregationist racist swamp demon beholden to anti-american forces like bloomberg jamie dimon and the feds

This post was edited by excellence on Jan 24 2022 04:26pm
Member
Posts: 53,139
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 24 2022 05:34pm
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CZITQ3Eq6cS/?utm_medium=copy_link

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/01/24/biden-calls-fox-news-reporter-peter-doocy-a-stupid-son-of-a-bitch.html

brandon calls a journalist a “stupid sob” for asking about the inflation that was supposed to be transitory

any of the lefties here who 100% support all of biden’s actions care to comment on this ‘assault’ on the free press? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

This post was edited by excellence on Jan 24 2022 05:35pm
Member
Posts: 11,637
Joined: Jun 10 2006
Gold: 2,460.05
Jan 24 2022 05:57pm
Quote (excellence @ Jan 24 2022 05:34pm)
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CZITQ3Eq6cS/?utm_medium=copy_link

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/01/24/biden-calls-fox-news-reporter-peter-doocy-a-stupid-son-of-a-bitch.html

brandon calls a journalist a “stupid sob” for asking about the inflation that was supposed to be transitory

any of the lefties here who 100% support all of biden’s actions care to comment on this ‘assault’ on the free press? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


Was he wrong?
Member
Posts: 53,139
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jan 24 2022 06:04pm
Quote (nomadwgk @ 24 Jan 2022 18:57)
Was he wrong?

the journalist is not wrong for asking about inflation. months ago the government (fed and white house) said inflation was transitory and we don’t need to worry about it. asking why it’s still running riot is common sense
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Jan 24 2022 06:19pm
Quote (excellence @ Jan 24 2022 05:25pm)
plenty of brown yellow red tan and black people of all genders made money off crypto. sadly an old white guy that you 100% support no matter what wants to overregulate it to kingdom come, because he is a lifelong segregationist racist swamp demon beholden to anti-american forces like bloomberg jamie dimon and the feds


China has regulated it. Russia is about to ban mining it because it fuels crime. Governments are going to regulate this little hobby like everything else.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18028038048058061009Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll