No, no. See from an unbiased non-homer perspective as someone watching the Celtics play against my team both with and without Kyrie, I can tell you (and anyone with eyes and a brain) that the Celtics were more dangerous without Kyrie.
They moved the ball better, they were more balanced, and a lot less predictable. With Kyrie, it's predictable and the guys around him get very little opportunity to actually ball out or "go off" on any given night.
It's no secret the Celtics were better without him, nobody except apparently a few people here actually still debate this. They were better the year before BEFORE they got him, they were mediocre with him last season when he played, and they're better now after getting rid of him. Shit, as a Sixers fan I WISH they kept him LOL. Even though the Celtics are our bitch now, so it doesn't matter either way.
Kyrie defines mediocrity when it comes to being a leader and "the guy" on any fucking team lmao. The guy is such a shit person and selfish prick, and literally can't be more than a #2 or #3 option on a contender because he needs an actual alpha on the team to guide him.
This post was edited by Sixers on Jan 16 2020 02:33pm