Why put time and money into a product when people will buy it if you don't?

worst thing ever in the beginning of d3

Personnaly Id love AH tbh .. except the 15% going to blizard. That was too nice. I mean you was able to being rich ez and when you wanted somthing, was really ez to get a build.

Y you didnt like it just curious?

the gaming world and world in general changes. Different people have different playstyles

and we should congrats them for their evolution. Even veteran players go forward and backward

because single player is not backward with all this technology. Let's Co-Exist.

D3 D4 was never meant to erase D2. A clue would be starcraft redone and WC3 reforged.

that player could be a kid, ur son is a kid. That player could be older. dad is older

They destroyed the magic with the Diablo-franchise

this. 100%

AH was one of the best things in d3 so it got removed LMAO

I loved the AH. Personally, I don't understand the, it ruined D3, argument because it gives all types of players a choice. Players that want to farm and play the game can do that. Players that want to spend money to build gear can do that. Players that are focused on monetization can do that too. It gives everybody freedom. I loved D2 because the trading aspect as so robust and I thought the AH provided that

RMAH encouraged the use of bots, it was obvious why it was removed

Yea.

For convenience, I think an in-game currency auction house would be nice, but people will still RMT and abuse botting. Guess Blizzard would rather have the RMT cycle through their own system instead of third parties though.
I have nothing against player to player trading like in D2 or PoE either.

Just please not D3's item binding system