Quote (Goomshill @ 19 Oct 2019 06:19)
well that's really the finer point about 'consent' isn't it? I've heard an awful lot from feminists about power imbalances in the workplace, and I've heard an awful lot from anti-Trumpers (cough icemage cough) about kompromat and our national security being threatened by sexual impropriety. Not a good look when the house oversight vice-chair is cucking her husband with two paid staffers at the same time (and lord, what a cuck. His rationalization for her first affair? "she's bi". Then she starts sleeping with another man)
I guess the implicit assumption behind this apparent double standard is that female staffers who engage with their male-boss-lover is that they were "sleeping their way up", that they obtained a position thanks to the affair which they couldnt have reached on their own through hard work. Which would then create an incentive for them to keep the affair going even if they dont want it anymore on a personal/sexual basis because ending the affair would mean a career slump.
I assume that when a female boss is sleeping with a male staffer, people dont have these implicit associations and therefore think there is less of a power imbalance than between male bosses and female staffers.
Quote
(and lord, what a cuck. His rationalization for her first affair? "she's bi". Then she starts sleeping with another man)
As far as I understood it, it was a three-way relationship, i.e. the husband was having 3-ways with Katie and the staffer.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 18 2019 11:31pm