Quote (Worrywart @ 7 Jun 2019 16:23)
I want to remind you that metasploit scammed it ~7 years ago and no copies have shown up since. Commerce and metasploit both quit d2 years ago.
I'd also remind you that most of the private duped valks were duped by the same two people (who have now owned almost every single valk)
In the month metasploit got Doorman's he also got 3-4 other valks and 2 btals and doesn't even show up in the history for most of them because, let's be real, history means nothing as long as there are people like havok420 that let scammers use them in fake histories to sell stolen or unperm valks.
Besides, I borrowed Doorman's as soon as he got it and didn't give it back until he found a buyer
https://i.gyazo.com/97a8b990c0fe79eb4ddb06350f2e8edf.pngAs much as I would love to see you spend money on this thing despite the fake history & numerous scammer owners and get burned, I'm 100% not saying this helmet is perm. I'm just saying it's about as likely as any other valk to be perm.
thanks. I wish those /time stamps would show the year.
So this thing has been clashed by bit already, and is about to be clashed by robbie/resi. At that point, as Ukon pointed out, I can't really worry about public dupes any more than I would for any other 123.
It's the private dupes that matter.
So the
most useful, specific info at this point, would be to know the ranges that private dupes were possible (e.g. "december 2014 to July 2015"), and then try to match them up with players in the history, and then reason as to whether those people are likely to do so (in addition to just asking them via pm)
But I mean, despite all the shade on doorman's, I think that given the price it may be a +ev play.