I like what Tommy is doing.
He is bringing a badly needed perspective to a country overrun by leftist degeneracy, big government and censorship.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on May 22 2019 03:23am

cool dude

intellectual response, as always

What does degeneracy mean?

How big is too big? It's not good to be too small or not have one at all either?

What's the difference between censorship and demanding responsibility for the things one says?

having sunk to a lower and usually corrupt and vicious state
: to sink into a low intellectual or moral state

ex: antifa. hostile muslim hordes.



The government dragging people to court over jokes and ripping signs out of peoples hands is more than 'responsibility for what they say'
As are degenerates attacking people for having different opinions and views.

Surely if someome spent fg on a topic the content of the op should be highly accurate?

Tommy is a bad dude.

Most lefists aren't antifa, nor are most Muslims hostile in practice (we can debate about the general attitudes of Muslims, though). They are a small minority just like the far right degenerates.

I can see the issue with court issues over jokes. I still believe that spoken words can surpass the threshold of becoming deeds when words are used to facilitate or outright commit crimes. If i tell someone to beat up someone else, is it a crime? If one hires a hitman, should he be sued for murder or just the hitman? After all, he just gave someone money and said a few words. These words made the difference.

If someone shows using carefully constructed studies, that a certain type of speech is statistically associated with increased violent crimes and uprisings and is able to prove a causal relationship, would you not hold the speech as a cause for the violence? I'm not advocating anything here really, just trying to point out dilemmas. Would restricting such speech be morally justified on the grounds of reducing overall violence?