Hello,
It's been 113 years since Einstein created his theory of relativity.
Since that date, there has been no major scientific theory anymore.

It seems to me that it shows failures in the scientific system.
Theories are at the base of any important scientific progress.

How come nobody works to create complex and elaborate scientific theories?
There was the theory of general relativity in 1915, by Albert Einstein.
There was string theory in 1984.

But there were no more theories than that.
How is it that no one is interested in the theory of culturalism?
How is it that everyone abandons the social sciences?
How is it that there is almost no progress in mathematics anymore?

There is a problem in the current scientific system.



There is no more real scientific progress.
Because people no longer make the effort to create elaborate theories.
Scientists just make observations.

Take the example of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
The prize was awarded to scientists who developed a microscopy observation technique: cryo-microscopy.

Take the example of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics.
The prize was awarded to scientists who verified Albert Einstein's hypothesis about the existence of gravitational waves.



There is no more real scientific progress.
I created two revolutionary theories.
And no scientist is interested in it except me.
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=78547392&f=90

There is a very serious problem in the current scientific system.



Note that I created an absolutely amazing progress in social sciences, which you can find there:


https://image.ibb.co/hH9oVd/intelligence_sociale.jpg

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 11 2018 02:06am

1. Have you heard of Stephen Hawking? Or maybe the IT revolution? Or maybe the difference in quality of medical care between today and 113 years ago? Or maybe the new techniques for discovering planets outside our solar system?
2. I read your two revolutionary theories. The reason nobody was interested was because the first one wasn't revolutionary (just a philosophical brain fart that everyone realizes at some point in their lives) and the second one was bullshit. Furthermore, both theories contained zero research, zero evidence and zero actionable results.

This post was edited by Leevee on May 11 2018 01:56am

The computer revolution is a technological revolution.
The improvement of medicine is a technological and social progress, but not a scientific progress.
Progress in astrology is also a technological progress.

It's great to create important technological advances.
But we must not stop creating scientific progress either.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on May 11 2018 02:07am

we're researching new TEAs in Romania

alot of very nice discoveries have been made with the second world war.

https://blog.findmypast.co.uk/10-everyday-inventions-you-owe-to-ww2-1434543995.html

btw...



so i dont understand why you are completely obsessed by einstein.

go to see a doctor is the best advice i can give, good luck and keep us informed.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on May 11 2018 02:15am

So what you mean is that technological advances do not rely on science?

This post was edited by Leevee on May 11 2018 02:24am

Card Sultan 2.0

What I mean is that science and technology are two very different things.
Since the Yalta conference, science has been subjected to very strict rigor.
Scientific theories must necessarily be plausible and consistent.

There was a regulation of science in 1945, and I think that led to a fall in scientific progress.

Well, duh. However, since technological advancement requires scientific advancement, your point is moot.



Do you believe that, if this regulation had existed 113 years ago, Einstein's theories would not have been accepted? In other words, do you think Einstein's theories would have not been deemed "plausible and consistent" today?

This post was edited by Leevee on May 11 2018 02:39am