Quote (uniquerare @ Oct 22 2017 02:00am)
While the above video is the beautifully explained evidence which now serves as the concrete reference dispelling the notion of planes partaking in the events in question,
this next video (and others out on youtube of course) synopsizes and adds to the technical dissemination of the visuals portrayed on the tv screen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPKq2K2dh6k
actually this video proposes an alternative theory to the belief structure portrayed in this thread
it supposes that an object did indeed impact the tower, and that that object was not a plane but rather a bulged disc-like object whose visual representation on the screen was superimposed by the image of a plane.
it's a really interesting concept, given that most people do believe something(s) physically impacted the towers that day
it would also explain how the "nose" was able to peak out of the other side of the building. it could have been the disc
this being said, i don't believe this theory is correct. video is well done and i could be wrong. definitely worth checking out, and not a super long video either