Quote (cambovenzi @ Dec 21 2018 02:19pm)
Amazing how you managed to listen to a 23 minute interview in less than 15 minutes.
Trying to dumb down a very interesting and varied interview about war as 'yeah man, TDS' isn't going to cut it.
You managed to dishonestly clip one statement out of a list and its broader context and pretend they are invalidly talking about TDS out of left field and dodging the real issue.
the kurds aren't the real issue.
As much as you'd like to sweep TDS. the deep state, and pervasive warmongering under the rug and talk about transgender bathrooms, not everyone is so willing to do so.
Not every interview or statement has to be about what you want them to talk about.
The sweeping leftist (and MSM) condemnation of Trump withdrawing troops when they are ostensibly anti-war is fascinating and deserves analysis and commentary.
(even if you dont like people recognizing the dangerous 'anti-trump no matter where that puts us on the issues' attitude)
how many strawman's can you fit into one post? perhaps leaving pard has left you more rusty than a Model T.
1. I didnt say in my post i listened to the entire video
2. i didnt try to dumb anything down, did not claim the entire video was a TDS circlejerk
3. i didn't dishonestly clip a single statement, i simply pointed out that when the host mentioned the Kurds Smith didn't even acknowlege he said it, and in the following minute or two didnt mention the kurds, only TDS.
4. i find TDS, the Deep state, and war mongering (especially) to all be worthwhile subjects.
5. i argued a seperate libertarian justification for not passing the bathroom laws, you disagreed, and are still butthurt clearly.
6. i took Fender to task yesterday about his TDS and general inability to do anything but give NPC answers
now that im past the bullshit strawmans out of left fucking field let's move on to the actual context, even though it's still a bullshit strawman:
Quote
As to the kurds:
Do you think democrats gave a flying fuck about the kurds a week ago? Thats not the real reason they are opposing trump on this.
Should US troops risk their lives or stay over there forever to try to save the kurds from another NATO member? Or is that not the primary goal of the US Armed Forces and the US government?
1. no the dems dont give a fuck
2. i know it's not the real reason, and TDS is in play, that doesn't excuse dodging the Kurdish issue altogether
3. the death counts in Syria are tiny compared to the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, as is the cost, as is the size force staying there. all important context
4. Turkey shouldn't be in NATO, and NATO shouldn't exist. it's a relevant point you're making but doesn't affect my stance personally.
I think personally the Kurds deserve a new Israel, hopefully somewhere far as fuck away from Muslims. we did it for Ze Jews, we did it for the Hmong, it's time for the Kurds. they're unwelcome anywhere they are and anywhere they can conceivably make it to. plenty of Muslim free cheap af real estate in Estonia, and buying it would be cheaper than defending the Kurds for another 20 years.
I hope you're having a happy holidays tho Cam.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 21 2018 02:39pm