obviously hes saying latavius.

start your darkwas as a low end rb2-flex.

Impressive warns

Son how

not needing any advice just mentioning a trade in one of my leagues... totally fair as the one guy needs a TE he dropped jordan reed (and i snagged him) and has vernon davis and charles clay, he is trading theilen for kelce

guy who has kelce has ertz, too and he prob doesnt mind which he keeps. i have diggs, who is out with the nagging groin injury so theilen may be a top option in our ppr league for a while. i guess the guy could play kelce and ertz since it's a flex league but he can sub him for wr on the byes

guy trading kelce is in 1st, other in 4th (im 3rd)

just crazy - kelce for theilen and it actually sounds halfway realistic

Totally reasonable given everything else you discussed, crazy though. Shit that would be vetoed faster than the speed of light if it was tried at the start of the season, vs seeming super reasonable 6 weeks in lol.

you have 10% less than me?

Anyone who trades for a TE is a bonehead considering Kittle, ASJ, Engram, and Njoku are available in most leagues

There will likely still be ppl who birch about it due to name recognition. From roster and production perspectives it makes sense for both.

Have a league where my opponent started Hill, Cooper and Alex Smith. RIP

Ofc, that's because people are stupid . When evaluating/vetoing trades, it should never just be player vs player, that's unfair. It should ALWAYS, be a by case analysis of who's getting who, how it benefits them, and if it's worth it to them. That's why I prefer trading during the season, vs trading before the season starts. Before the season starts, I'm basing my vetos/accepts off estimates, which is bullshit lol, but you gotta keep shit in check the best you can, especially when you see the clearcut #1 team about to trade rape someone.