d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The World Cup
Prev1161718192022Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 17,405
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 12,842.80
Jul 15 2026 12:25pm
This post is a violation of the site rules and appropriate action was taken.

How many English players does England have?
2?


I know this is a trap and when I answer you're going to move the goalpost. English, in this context, is a nationality. Is that what you're talking about or why don't you ever just say what you mean?

Also, fk off tho I got more exciting things going on right now than your bizarre brand of horse shit. Maybe tomorrow
Member
Posts: 24,113
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Warn: 10%
Jul 15 2026 12:44pm
I know this is a trap and when I answer you're going to move the goalpost. English, in this context, is a nationality. Is that what you're talking about or why don't you ever just say what you mean?

Also, fk off tho I got more exciting things going on right now than your bizarre brand of horse shit. Maybe tomorrow


I don't move anything, you just don't like facts for some reason.
English means when the national team only field players born in and native to their nation.
Member
Posts: 56,492
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 567,726.57
Jul 15 2026 01:06pm
I know this is a trap and when I answer you're going to move the goalpost. English, in this context, is a nationality. Is that what you're talking about or why don't you ever just say what you mean?

Also, fk off tho I got more exciting things going on right now than your bizarre brand of horse shit. Maybe tomorrow


An element in the media is very anti-foreigner — or more accurately, anti-non-white. This is a longstanding issue in English society, going back decades. So when people look at the England squad and see that 11 of the 23 players are non-white or of mixed ethnicity, that's what the racist rabble is really talking about when they sneer about 'non-English players.' It's not about birthplace or passports. It's about not fitting the supremacist ideal — white skin, blue eyes, blonde hair. They don't see those players as 'properly English,' no matter where they were born or how many times they've sung the anthem. You know, racists.

For myself, coming from Ireland, we all want England to win, noting we support their football clubs, and it lifts their country. The negative view of England is gone 20 years and more.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jul 15 2026 01:08pm
Member
Posts: 24,113
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Warn: 10%
Jul 15 2026 01:16pm
An element in the media is very anti-foreigner — or more accurately, anti-non-white. This is a longstanding issue in English society, going back decades. So when people look at the England squad and see that 11 of the 23 players are non-white or of mixed ethnicity, that's what the racist rabble is really talking about when they sneer about 'non-English players.' It's not about birthplace or passports. It's about not fitting the supremacist ideal — white skin, blue eyes, blonde hair. They don't see those players as 'properly English,' no matter where they were born or how many times they've sung the anthem. You know, racists.

For myself, coming from Ireland, we all want England to win, noting we support their football clubs, and it lifts their country. The negative view of England is gone 20 years and more.


Ad hom pejoratives.....
There is only one demographic native to England and you know it.
Same thing for Ireland.
Member
Posts: 56,492
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 567,726.57
Jul 15 2026 01:48pm
Ad hom pejoratives.....
There is only one demographic native to England and you know it.
Same thing for Ireland.


Native? What does that even mean? Let's take an example: Marcus Rashford plays for England. He's Black. His ancestry "originates" (a subjective term) from Jamaica. His father, Robert Rashford, lived in Jamaica. After WWII, Britain faced a massive labour shortage because many of the men were dead. The solution was to invite foreign workers. For England, that meant the Windrush scheme. Those workers were invited to the UK and were the precursors to broader international travel - accelerated by trains and planes. Generations later, their children and grandchildren now live and work in England and Europe. That's the reality. Rashford's family didn't just 'turn up' — they were asked to come. They were born in England, educated in England, made families and will live and die in England.

So when you say he's 'not native' to England — well, his ancestry isn't native to Jamaica either. His ancestors were taken from West Africa and enslaved on the island. So how far back do you want to go? I mean, you're in the Americas right? Your people aren't native to America either — unless you're referring to the Native Americans. So by your logic, are you 'native' to America? Or do send them all back to Europe?

The reality is, national identity has mutated. It's different now than it was 200+ years ago. You can point to social and cultural issues if you want, but all life is change. The world moves on. The England squad in 2026 reflects that. Yes an element wants to live in the past, is not happy, protests. I would say it is each nations government to resolve these issues. They don't, and so the problem festers.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jul 15 2026 01:56pm
Member
Posts: 24,113
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Warn: 10%
Jul 15 2026 02:24pm
Native? What does that even mean? Let's take an example: Marcus Rashford plays for England. He's Black. His ancestry "originates" (a subjective term) from Jamaica. His father, Robert Rashford, lived in Jamaica. After WWII, Britain faced a massive labour shortage because many of the men were dead. The solution was to invite foreign workers. For England, that meant the Windrush scheme. Those workers were invited to the UK and were the precursors to broader international travel - accelerated by trains and planes. Generations later, their children and grandchildren now live and work in England and Europe. That's the reality. Rashford's family didn't just 'turn up' — they were asked to come. They were born in England, educated in England, made families and will live and die in England.

So when you say he's 'not native' to England — well, his ancestry isn't native to Jamaica either. His ancestors were taken from West Africa and enslaved on the island. So how far back do you want to go? I mean, you're in the Americas right? Your people aren't native to America either — unless you're referring to the Native Americans. So by your logic, are you 'native' to America? Or do send them all back to Europe?

The reality is, national identity has mutated. It's different now than it was 200+ years ago. You can point to social and cultural issues if you want, but all life is change. The world moves on. The England squad in 2026 reflects that. Yes an element wants to live in the past, is not happy, protests. I would say it is each nations government to resolve these issues. They don't, and so the problem festers.


Wrong, I am 100% native to The United States of America.
Feel free to check the names on the Declaration of Independence, Constitution and the Bill of Rights for proof.
And all Africans are native to Africa, duh....

This post was edited by sirthom on Jul 15 2026 02:25pm
Member
Posts: 56,492
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 567,726.57
Jul 15 2026 02:27pm
Wrong, I am 100% native to The United States of America.
Feel free to check the names on the Declaration of Independents, Constitution and the Bill of Rights for proof.
And all Africans are native to Africa, duh....


Well, if you can go to a country, live there, declare its your country, and have kids and grand kids, then so can any one else. In the meantime its England 1, Argentina 0, with a white "non native" english player scoring the goal (his heritage is Irish-Scottish).
Member
Posts: 24,113
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Warn: 10%
Jul 15 2026 02:29pm
Well, if you can go to a country, live there, declare its your country, and have kids and grand kids, then so can any one else. In the meantime its England 1, Argentina 0, with a white "non native" english player scoring the goal (his heritage is Irish-Scottish).


We didn't go to a country, we created it.
Show how these other groups created England.
Hint: you can't, because they didn't.
Not English and never will be.
Member
Posts: 39,823
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Jul 15 2026 02:39pm
Verily, Allah grants His tawfīq to these mujāhidūn of the beautiful game, and the breast expands with joy

/e
The Shayateen have struck a goal, but may the curse of Allah be upon them, and may His wrath descend upon their ranks! They celebrate for a fleeting moment, yet their joy is but the mockery of Iblis, for the final decree rests with al-Jabbar, the Lord of Majesty. Let them not rejoice, for every strike they land is but a nail in their own coffins. The banner of truth shall not be toppled, and the Ummah of Muhammad (ﷺ) shall rise, purified by trial. To Allah we belong, and to Him we return, and He is the Best of Disposers of affairs. May He humiliate the oppressors and grant victory to the righteous, for His promise is true, and His might is above all might. La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah, there is no power nor strength except with Allah, the Exalted, the Magnificent. Go, English Emirates!

This post was edited by Norlander on Jul 15 2026 02:53pm
Member
Posts: 17,405
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 12,842.80
Jul 15 2026 03:39pm
Cheating bastards
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1161718192022Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll