You claiming its a person while simultaneously showing me a picture of some prehistoric lizard is peak irony. (Not to mention proving evolution) Thanks for the laugh.

Do you know how language works?
Many words hold multiple meanings you don't get to cherrypick ones that you like.

When someone says they are going to rob a bank for money you don't assume they will rob a bank of a river. The author clearly intended a building a place where money is exchanged not a bank of a river bed...

The author of the bible clearly spelled out that a serpent is a beast of the fields and crawl on its belly. The Hebrew word nachash (נָחָשׁ), literally means "snake" or "serpent".
This is non controversial because you would not find a biblical scholar who disagrees with me. So its not what addone exclusively thinks. You are literally arguing against your own religion
Why dont you use a translation from a hebrew lexicon from a christian website and stop embarrassing yourself I actually feel sorry for you sometimes.
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h5175/kjv/wlc/0-1/

This post was edited by addone on Jul 13 2026 06:15am

addone doing the dance with definitions. it says one thing addone demands another.
national geographic says its a snake. addone does his dance and says its a lizard
losing a function isnt 'evolution

which should also mean you cant reject the ones you dont like

nobody would think its a river bank

why not just post the actual scripture
o? so now snake also means serpent. ok

one of the things i have learned in my time interacting with 'atheists is they are very gifted at giving an air of authority, can be intimidating.
when i first started researching i was some kind of agnostic so i wasnt intimidated at all.
i viewed it that if God wasnt true i could keep drinking and could quit concerning myself. but if he was true then i had problems.
so "atheists didnt intimidate me so i would check up on their claims. i found a lot of bullchit.

addone is trying to give it off like he is some kind of authority when it comes to the word nachash (נָחָשׁ) ..........ya bullchit the 'atheist is only an authority when it comes to bullchittery

here is an interesting read. 'atheists always offer great potential for bible study
Hebrew Word Study: SERPENT or SHINING ONE (NAHASH)
by Dr. Eitan Bar 9 minutes read
https://eitan.bar/articles/hebrew-word-study-serpent-nahash/

we are on page 333. anyone into numerology? i had a crazy experience with 777 once. i see triple numbers a lot. wake up all kinds of times to look at clock and it will be in trips.

anyway thats the crazy way i ended up a christian. part of the way at least, its been a crazy ride . 'atheist would make a claim and i would check up on it. 'atheist would instruct what scripture meant. i would put the said scripture into context and read it. they do a lot of nasty scripture twisting. hard to believe anyone would lie that much. its a lot like the lefties. most of them are lefties. maybe all of them?

This post was edited by TiStuff on Jul 13 2026 01:59pm

You 100% cherrypicked the article I bet you it says snakes EVOLVED from a distant lizard that had legs. You claimed snake means a deceitful person why are you showing me a picture of a snake or a prehistoric lizard that is evolving to be a snake? Own yourself much?

Losing function is evolution. This isn’t oops I injured my leg and can't use it type of situation. An entire branch of evolution adapts physiologicaly to its environment. The genetic makeup of an animal changes completely to something else. How do you not know basic biology?

Nobody thinks its a deceitful person. All christians agree its a serpent I even provided you a link to Hebrew lexicon in a bible from a christian point of view. You are literally arguing against Christian narrative itself lol.

What a strange hill to die on.



No I don't claim to be an authority I literally quoted you the definition directly from a christian source. You are mad at me but its not "addone's" definition its a hebrew definition from the bible itself.

The article you quoted proves my point. Did you even read it?
The serpent in the bible is a magical variety that had legs and perhaps even wings which is NOT a person but a magical dragon creature which some christians belief.

Direct quotes from your article
"the NAHASH in Genesis was not a lowly creature slithering in the dirt—it was a radiant, upright, possibly winged being"
"John, in Revelation, speaks of “a great fiery red dragon” (Revelation 12:3) and “the great dragon… that ancient serpent, called the devil, or Satan.” (Revelation 12:9)"


Nowhere in the article does it say serpent was a deceitful person. You just owned yourself .... again...

This post was edited by addone on Jul 13 2026 04:01pm

Then let's review shall we? We have your original post here:

https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=107619089&f=119&p=691993172



It seems to me that my "assumptions" were based on a very key word that you yourself said. Well? Did you actually make that phone call? I would expect to hear it on the news in the coming days.

You are also missing the point. You and I both know that you are lying and made this all up. The difference is you are not willing to take the lie very far and go all the way. You will stop at a certain point.

However if you are telling the truth then you would be willing to go just a little farther. Maybe even to the point of death. Before you claim "all religions" then at least that is a step forward in the right direction. People will die for their beliefs but nobody will die for a lie.

As for the rest of your post let's go back to Hebrews again.

Hebrews 1:1-4 ESV

1 In the past God spoke to our ancestors through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the universe. 3 The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven. 4 So he became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.

You don't get to assume the story is fake and that I am lying remember we are using your methodology to examine the evidence to determine if I am lying or telling the truth. Unless you want to walk back on your word and admit you don't examine a story based on its merits and draw a predetermined conclusion instead? Don't expose yourself like that just yet.


So your only objection to not believe my story because you haven't seen it on the news?
Even though I told you no one else seen the hippo so what would a news story prove exactly? Walk me through the process of how that would build credibility or reliability?

my guy are you versed or simply GPTing? A for effort at the very least

This post was edited by Raid on Jul 14 2026 07:42am

The majority of his debating has been copy and paste from other websites and asking gpt to explain "why it is wrong".

Then ddone chooses to approach all responses with Facebook memes.

There hasn't been an actual counter argument to the gospel in 333 pages now and he is still stuck at, "I think it is fake because I said so".

He's been corrected countless times on his misunderstanding of everything he's been copying and pasting.

It's been only troll behavior on his end and he has no intention on actually discussing the bible.

When we agree on the facts, but disagree on the interpretation, then a positive conversation or debate can occur.

In the situation we are in, we don't agree on the facts, or even on the nature of reality.

All we can ever do in this thread is talk past each other.

I don't believe a counter example is needed because I don't see the gospel as an argument for god being real anymore than I'd see the amazing spiderman #1 as an argument for spiderman being real.