You sound like Patrick Moore when he said its safe enough to drink during an interview, they provided him and he promptly exited the interview. The Pro GMO lobbyist for Monsanto's.
You have evidence that past studies, by Independent scientists of course was actually written by Monsanto's. Of which they did over and over and over again and got caught doing via leaked emails. Even being as brash to say remember to work it into our PR loop, lmao. And they just kept doing it.
Oh and then we have the leaked emails from Monsanto's to the EPA that heavily suggest , and I mean you would have to stretch it to think they were not directly telling them what to say but we can leave it at suggesting what to say. The private billion dollar company heavily suggesting a government regulatory body, I mean who could imagine that.
Now Bayer has thus settled over what 114K as in number of lawsuits tied to Roundup and into the billions of dollars in settlement money all for what they are touting is totally fine. Wonder why they are the ones paying out?
The amount of products, services, fees, predatory lending practices, etc that have all had consumer protection put in place that is then over-turned or products touted as healthy and safe from industry sponsored studies / data points that then turned out not to be is quite the list.
I wonder if the EPA has ever suffered any scrutiny because they constantly have former pro chemical lobbyists appointed?
Douglas Troutman: Appointed Assistant Administrator for the EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP). He previously served as the interim CEO and top lobbyist for the American Cleaning Institute, which represents cleaning product supply chains and frequently pushes back against chemical regulations.
Nancy Beck: Served as a senior official and deputy assistant administrator in the OCSPP. Before joining the agency, she was a leader and lobbyist for the American Chemistry Council—the largest chemical industry trade group in the U.S.
Lynn Ann Dekleva: Served as a leader in the EPA's chemical safety office. She previously held senior roles at DuPont and the American Chemistry Council, where she fought against regulations of chemicals like formaldehyde.
Kyle Kunkler: Appointed to oversee the EPA's pesticide policy as a deputy assistant administrator. Prior to his EPA tenure, he was the top lobbyist for the American Soybean Association and advocated for the continued use of contentious herbicides.
But who am I to say, if you want to lick that degraded teflon pan while smoking its up to you. I mean there was enough evidence presented by industry that it was totally safe.
Call it a conspiracy if you want, time and time again has shown money usually carries until it becomes too obvious.
Did a conspiracy make agencies in a variety of countries all come to the same findings?
Was it nefarious cover-up that researchers keep posting studies of animals being exposed to lifelong glyphosate with no ill effects?
Any discerning mind should be able to tell the difference between a cover-up in spite of scientific evidence, and people making spurious allegations. Ask yourself what the scenarios would look like
If Monsanto was trying desperately to censor the evil truth that "roundup causes cancer", then with all the litigation and research into it over a half a century, someone would have conclusively proven it. There would be some hard studies that would establish it. Not "drown a rat in 10x its bodyweight of a substance and it suffocates" or "there's a 41% statistical uptick in cases of non-hodgkins lymphoma in a population that's much older than our control population and doesn't die from gun violence in the inner cities so they instead have higher rates of cancer because they live long enough to get cancer". If there
was an actual causation, someone would have figured out the mechanics. The wikipedia article would have no choice but to say how glyphosate does X, X impacts Y, Y causes cancer. Except that isn't the case, because nobody even has a credible
theory.
The fact is that anti-science is easy on the masses. People love to believe in conspiracy theories and refuse to believe the hard science of how things work, whenever anything is more complicated than the superficially obvious. Nuclear power gets hamstrung by unnecessary levels of radiation because 'NUCLEAR ENERGY SCARY!". GMO foods like roundup-resistant crops? 2spooky. Covid vaccines!? That's how they sterilize the masses. Chemtrails? Turns the frogs gay.