d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Christianity Is Obviously Fake
Prev1285286287288Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 16,070
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jun 15 2026 02:40pm
Do you believe in the wind?


If you are talking about the weather that dries your clothing on the line then sure.
Do you believe in unicorns and satyrs?

And just to add:

I guarantee that you don't have any evidence of your own family tree that spans back even a few hundred years. Your great great great great grandma or grandpa?
Show me proof of their existence. Practice what you preach.

Maybe start with your lack of evidence in your own family tree before you start with someone else.

Do I sound logical if I suggest they didn't exist and are a fabrication because you can't provide me with facts? I bet the only fact you have is their name or sirname because you hold it still to this day. Or what tales your parents or current family members might have told you.
Show me the facts though not the stories or texts. Go on and practice what you preach. I bet you can't...


I can trace my lineage back to European ancestors which all have both records and archeological evidence of their existence. I don't need to know every single of my specific great great great grandparents records you can also test for DNA to verify. Amalekites have 0 written records and 0 archeological physical proof. Let me put it this way Amalekites have as much evidence for their existence as Elves and Orcs.
Member
Posts: 16,070
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jun 15 2026 03:30pm
Barbaric acts are a part of life.
They may be alarming but it doesn't mean the person(s) committing the act are always doing something illegal.

Christians get their morals from the law. The law comes from God. You can't fabricate scientific laws of nature just like you can't fabricate Christian law.
If you are wanting to speculate about certain scenarios as in what I would and wouldn't do under certain conditions then keep in mind that if the act it's unlawful I don't condone or wouldn't commit it. Simple.


Then you just conceded to the fact that morality is arbitrary only the "devine" authority can decide. So then killing babies becomes lawful and even mandatory as long as an invisible wizard tells you its ok.
What if god tells you to go and slaughter infants and animals like in the bible? Which laws are you prioritizing? Because "barbaric parts" as you call them are inexcusable/unlawful under any circumstances for humans in this day and age. A wild animal has no agency and a book that condones such vile acts is nothing more than a primitive psychopath.

If you are ignoring the bible and only obeying man made laws and rules then bible becomes arbitrary and not the ultimate authority. Which means you like to pretend like it matters but you will choose not to follow it when it becomes inconvenient.
Member
Posts: 46,941
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jun 15 2026 07:38pm
Then you just conceded to the fact that morality is arbitrary only the "devine" authority can decide. So then killing babies becomes lawful and even mandatory as long as an invisible wizard tells you its ok.
What if god tells you to go and slaughter infants and animals like in the bible? Which laws are you prioritizing? Because "barbaric parts" as you call them are inexcusable/unlawful under any circumstances for humans in this day and age. A wild animal has no agency and a book that condones such vile acts is nothing more than a primitive psychopath.

If you are ignoring the bible and only obeying man made laws and rules then bible becomes arbitrary and not the ultimate authority. Which means you like to pretend like it matters but you will choose not to follow it when it becomes inconvenient.


its proven you have no concern about babies. what eats you is the idea of judgment.
Member
Posts: 17,587
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 15 2026 09:34pm
Dodging again? Let's try it again. Tell me in your own words what you think might possibly happen if those babies were to grow up without the Father, who was a soldier, killed by the Israelites? What do you think they might do when they become of age?
Member
Posts: 16,070
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jun 15 2026 10:35pm
its proven you have no concern about babies. what eats you is the idea of judgment.


How is it proven? Btw still waiting on your proof on how Amalekites are sodomite or even existed. The amount of lies you piled on here is stacking up high.
Inb4 dodge
Member
Posts: 17,587
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 16 2026 05:51am
How is it proven? Btw still waiting on your proof on how Amalekites are sodomite or even existed. The amount of lies you piled on here is stacking up high.
Inb4 dodge


I can only imagine how painful it must be trying to tell you any kind of event that happened. Even something simple like if you were to ask: "What did you do at School today?" You would respond with "Give me the evidence the Teacher said that. I want an audio recording of this supposed lesson in School." Or "That other kid said what to you at lunch time? Did you just happen to record it? Otherwise it didn't happen."

You must have some major trust issues. I don't know what happened to you when you were much younger but it is obviously having a profound effect on you.
Member
Posts: 46,941
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jun 16 2026 05:53am
How is it proven? Btw still waiting on your proof on how Amalekites are sodomite or even existed. The amount of lies you piled on here is stacking up high.
Inb4 dodge


the only concern you ever shown for babies are comments you make about ancient documents you say you dont even believe. you dont say chit about whats happening in our own time.
fake as every other 'atheist

in the ancient documents that you know nothing about

ancient documents biblical and other wise.
archeologist statements

your the liar, belong to the club of liars, over 100 years of lying

1. Charles Darwin and the theory of 'evolution- gets a pass because he didnt call it fact
2.haeckels embryo drawings- 1874- early detected fraud- mass reprinted in textbooks as "proof" for 'evolution. 'atheists "the super logic minds" never did chit to challenge this. when do 'atheists actually become "scientific" as opposed to just "agenda" based liars
3rd piltdown man 1912- 'atheists hold themselves on high claiming to be the greatest critical thinkers that ever graced the world- longest running fraud in the history of modern science. the real mystery is how these clowns ever became the face of modern science?
4th nebraska man 1922- a master work of 'atheist imagination figuring out stuff........
5th whale evolution. incomplete fossils are the best kind of fossils. in fact the worse condition a fossil is in the better it proves 'evolution for some reason? as we will see more of this 'atheist magic in later posts
6th junk DNA should of been the end of atheism. but imaginations and delusions are not defeated by things like facts
7. Harlen Bretz 1927- dont bring science we dont like.
8.Australopithecus afarensis 1978 - aka lucy "missing link" APE fossil with no hands, feet or face. gets reconstructed with human hands, human feet and face of choice. then its called "proof" of evolution.
9. 1980's rna world hypothesis
RNA WORLD HYPOTHESIS was the 'atheists answer to abiogenesis. O and how smug the 'atheists guffawing and pushing it in everyones face.
the lack of being scientific rigorous when the experiment (that was already passed peer reviewed)was tested for "repeatable" it miserably failed and was retracted.
the 'atheist clown show repeated it self once again. being sloppy in science methodology and now has contaminated the peer review process.
but i can give some credit as the person responsible for the paper said in a rare honest moment rarely seen in 'atheist science
The authors—one of them a Nobel Laureate—later confessed, “In retrospect, we were totally blinded by our belief” and “we were not as careful or rigorous as we should have been.

‘RNA World’ Paper Retracted
https://larshaukeland.com/bits-pieces/scientific-articles/rna-world-paper-retracted/

that the 'atheist community never called any of this abuse of science out is just more proof what a failure the whole of 'atheism is..........

'atheism and their claims of "critical thinking" is just a trash can full of chit

This post was edited by TiStuff on Jun 16 2026 05:57am
Member
Posts: 2,663
Joined: Aug 3 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 16 2026 06:05am
Then you just conceded to the fact that morality is arbitrary only the "devine" authority can decide. So then killing babies becomes lawful and even mandatory as long as an invisible wizard tells you its ok.
What if god tells you to go and slaughter infants and animals like in the bible? Which laws are you prioritizing? Because "barbaric parts" as you call them are inexcusable/unlawful under any circumstances for humans in this day and age. A wild animal has no agency and a book that condones such vile acts is nothing more than a primitive psychopath.

If you are ignoring the bible and only obeying man made laws and rules then bible becomes arbitrary and not the ultimate authority. Which means you like to pretend like it matters but you will choose not to follow it when it becomes inconvenient.


Wait so you are European, reading the bible alot now, talking about God 'telling' people things or sending them messages in a literal sense, and discussing the Amalekites situation in literal terms. It also appears that you would be anti-abortion, don't want innocent people to suffer unjustly and so forth. And you are discussing the morals in the bible from a legal stand point now too. I bet you are starting to come to the realization that your ancestors were Christian too.
This is what us Christians somewhat refer to as Enlightenment.

The longer this discussion goes on the more you are gravitating towards the Bible not away from it...
Member
Posts: 9,006
Joined: Mar 15 2008
Gold: 2,150.00
Jun 16 2026 01:45pm
If you are talking about the weather that dries your clothing on the line then sure.
Do you believe in unicorns and satyrs?


You have separated them already!! Great.

The point:

You cannot see the wind, but you can feel/see/smell/taste the effects of the wind.

I have never seen, felt, tasted, or smelled a satyr or unicorn.

Scientists are diving off of your points more and more each day. Science is starting to lean into the intelligent design.... Kinda feel like your taking the L just to keep these dumb threads going

Wait so you are European, reading the bible alot now, talking about God 'telling' people things or sending them messages in a literal sense, and discussing the Amalekites situation in literal terms. It also appears that you would be anti-abortion, don't want innocent people to suffer unjustly and so forth. And you are discussing the morals in the bible from a legal stand point now too. I bet you are starting to come to the realization that your ancestors were Christian too.
This is what us Christians somewhat refer to as Enlightenment.

The longer this discussion goes on the more you are gravitating towards the Bible not away from it...


LOVE THIS!!! This is true. So many, like CS Lewis, start off setting out to disprove the Bible.

This post was edited by MaysLanding on Jun 16 2026 01:48pm
Member
Posts: 16,070
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jun 16 2026 02:25pm
You have separated them already!! Great.

The point:

You cannot see the wind, but you can feel/see/smell/taste the effects of the wind.

I have never seen, felt, tasted, or smelled a satyr or unicorn.

Scientists are diving off of your points more and more each day. Science is starting to lean into the intelligent design.... Kinda feel like your taking the L just to keep these dumb threads going



LOVE THIS!!! This is true. So many, like CS Lewis, start off setting out to disprove the Bible.


You dodged answering my question while I answered yours.
Now ask yourself why you never seen, felt, tasted or smelled a unicorn or satyr? You just self owned yourself with that point.
Science is doing the opposite its explaining more what the primative mind used to think was the work of some magical being in the clouds.

Wait so you are European, reading the bible alot now, talking about God 'telling' people things or sending them messages in a literal sense, and discussing the Amalekites situation in literal terms. It also appears that you would be anti-abortion, don't want innocent people to suffer unjustly and so forth. And you are discussing the morals in the bible from a legal stand point now too. I bet you are starting to come to the realization that your ancestors were Christian too.
This is what us Christians somewhat refer to as Enlightenment.

The longer this discussion goes on the more you are gravitating towards the Bible not away from it...


No I am not European I just told you I have distant European ancestry like most people. Am I talking to an illiterate person?

You also completely dodged my question again. Its safe to say you have no interest understanding and seeking truth. A blind believer.


This post was edited by addone on Jun 16 2026 02:42pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1285286287288Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll