How is it proven? Btw still waiting on your proof on how Amalekites are sodomite or even existed. The amount of lies you piled on here is stacking up high.
Inb4 dodge
the only concern you ever shown for babies are comments you make about ancient documents you say you dont even believe. you dont say chit about whats happening in our own time.
fake as every other 'atheist
in the ancient documents that you know nothing about
ancient documents biblical and other wise.
archeologist statements
your the liar, belong to the club of liars, over 100 years of lying
1. Charles Darwin and the theory of 'evolution- gets a pass because he didnt call it fact
2.haeckels embryo drawings- 1874- early detected fraud- mass reprinted in textbooks as "proof" for 'evolution. 'atheists "the super logic minds" never did chit to challenge this. when do 'atheists actually become "scientific" as opposed to
just "agenda" based liars3rd piltdown man 1912- 'atheists hold themselves on high claiming to be the greatest critical thinkers that ever graced the world- longest running fraud in the history of modern science. the real mystery is how these clowns ever became the face of modern science?
4th nebraska man 1922- a master work of 'atheist imagination figuring out stuff........
5th whale evolution. incomplete fossils are the best kind of fossils. in fact the worse condition a fossil is in the better it proves 'evolution for some reason? as we will see more of this
'atheist magic in later posts
6th junk DNA should of been the end of atheism. but imaginations and delusions are not defeated by things like facts
7. Harlen Bretz 1927- dont bring science we dont like.
8.Australopithecus afarensis 1978 - aka lucy "missing link" APE fossil with no hands, feet or face. gets reconstructed with human hands, human feet and face of choice. then its called "proof" of evolution.
9. 1980's rna world hypothesis
RNA WORLD HYPOTHESIS was the 'atheists answer to abiogenesis. O and how smug the 'atheists guffawing and pushing it in everyones face.
the lack of being scientific rigorous when the experiment (that was already passed peer reviewed)was tested for "repeatable" it miserably failed and was retracted.
the 'atheist clown show repeated it self once again. being sloppy in science methodology and now has contaminated the peer review process.
but i can give some credit as the person responsible for the paper said in a rare honest moment rarely seen in 'atheist science
The authors—one of them a Nobel Laureate—later confessed, “In retrospect, we were totally blinded by our belief” and “we were not as careful or rigorous as we should have been.
‘RNA World’ Paper Retracted
https://larshaukeland.com/bits-pieces/scientific-articles/rna-world-paper-retracted/that the 'atheist community never called any of this abuse of science out is just more proof what a failure the whole of 'atheism is..........
'atheism and their claims of "critical thinking" is just a trash can full of chitThis post was edited by TiStuff on Jun 16 2026 05:57am