d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The World Cup
Prev14567810Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 56,457
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 580,181.52
Jun 15 2026 11:10am
so the US has all the right to discriminate, and is doing so for reasons other than racism, but they are hostile? lol


It is not that the US has a right to discriminate, its that it does discriminate for its own reasons, which the US (right or wrong) sees as necessary to protest itself. I dont understand what you mean by "but they are hostile", I think a better way of framing it is: The US has interests not allies, and chooses to be hostile to those nations that infringe on US interests. However this notion of hostility is separate from this debate, unless I overlooked something in this conversation? To repeat what I said earlier : there is nothing wrong with the US defending itself from criminals, but being hostile to a person, based on their nationality, is discrimination. The US is the most capable country on the planet, and should therefore be capable enough to defend itself from hostile forces without blanket-hostility toward everyone from a given country.

i.e. barring a referee because of his nationality, while KNOWING he is not a threat, is just dumb.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jun 15 2026 11:15am
Member
Posts: 14,603
Joined: Oct 2 2007
Gold: 25,385.67
Jun 15 2026 11:13am
It is not that the US has a right to discriminate, its that it does discriminate for its own reasons, which the US (right or wrong) sees as necessary to protest itself.
I dont understand what you mean by "but they are hostile", I think a better way of framing it is: The US has interests not allies, and chooses to be hostile to those nations that infringe on US interests. However this notion of hostility is separate from this debate, unless I overlooked something in this conversation?


you were the one that said that Trump has created a hostile environment for foreigners traveling for the world cup...

This post was edited by C4NTWO on Jun 15 2026 11:14am
Member
Posts: 56,457
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 580,181.52
Jun 15 2026 11:15am
you were the one that said that Trump has created a hostile environment for foreigners traveling for the world cup...


thanks for clarification, and yes, I stand by that. Do you disagree with that assessment?
Member
Posts: 14,603
Joined: Oct 2 2007
Gold: 25,385.67
Jun 15 2026 11:16am
thanks for clarification, and yes, I stand by that. Do you disagree with that assessment?


yes, because a country protecting itself by restricting access should not be viewed as "hostility"... because it isnt.

This post was edited by C4NTWO on Jun 15 2026 11:32am
Member
Posts: 20,522
Joined: Aug 6 2008
Gold: 450.92
Jun 18 2026 05:58pm
There are a few things to unpack here. I won't comment on the anniversary—that's a minefield.


Its the 250th anniversary of the USA? what more is there to comment on? How is that a "minefield"?!?!?!? I really dont understand this comment. Do you want to just say you hate America? Go ahead and say it for the record. And go on defending nations like IRAN and China.


Quote
going back on topic ->

Historically, World Cup group stage tickets were accessible, with average resale prices around $687 in 2014 ($920 today) and official face-value options as low as $69 in 2022. For 2026 in America, the situation has changed dramatically. The U.S. legal resale market allows professional brokers—many American—to buy tickets during FIFA sales and relist them with no price caps. FIFA facilitates this by taking a commission on its official Resale Marketplace. This is pure capitalism at work: scarcity, high demand, and no price controls. Resellers charge what the market will bear, even if that means seats sit empty. The result is average group stage resale prices of $1,277, with some matches exceeding $2,500. The clearest consequence is visible on television: empty seats at World Cup matches, not because tickets are unavailable, but because fans have been priced out. In this capitalist system, maximum profit takes priority over filling stadiums.

The US exports capitalism selectively, in order to ensure US profits surge. When the US government refused to allow Nvidia to sell advanced chips to China, it was framed as national interest. But when China responded by saying, "OK, we will ban the sale of all Nvidia chips in China," the US cried foul. Similarly, when the US sanctioned Russian energy exports, and India continued buying Russian oil, the US cried foul. India's response was simple: we are a willing buyer on the international market, purchasing at market value. That is capitalism. So what is the problem? The problem is that the US only believes in free markets when it is winning. When others play the same game—by the same rules—America calls it unfair.

Imagine if the Superbowl was held in another country and the price per ticket was increased inline with what we are seeing with the World Cup.




Lets just make one thing clear so we all understand and are in agreement. CHINA CP does not play by the "rules". They steal intellectual property, unleash Covid upon the world, say it originated from a market in the city... Doesnt seem fair to me...


As for ticket sellers. are you talking about something like Ticketmaster? Ya idk seems like the prices are similar to what they were 12 years ago, inflated some. But you are forgetting one thing these services provide. when you purchase thru them you are getting a verified ticket and not a counterfeit. So that is good. There are a finite number of tickets per game, not all can go that want to probably. If the tickets go unsold, seller takes big loss. So thats good. then market correct, ticket price goes lower? I dont really understand your issue? Not everyone can go, Money gets you things and buys things you want, usually how it works. What do you suggest? Everyone who wants ticket puts name in raffle? and winners have to provide ID and fingerprints to assure they dont resell their tickets? Seems very un-american to me. Just to attend a sporting event... Remember USA is host nation, maybe just understand those coming to view are visitors and they should respect other nations and their customs. If capitalism is American, respect it and pay for the ticket, Or dont come at all and watch on your TV.

And for the record, im not a big fan of resellers or the model but they provide a service and probably make accessing tickets easier and eliminates black market scammers ripping people off. So there are some benefits.

This post was edited by GuyLadouche on Jun 18 2026 06:03pm
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Apr 18 2026
Gold: 36.00
Jun 18 2026 06:21pm
meanwhile in reality people are just celebrating and enjoying themselves
Member
Posts: 56,457
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 580,181.52
Jun 18 2026 06:39pm
Its the 250th anniversary of the USA? what more is there to comment on? How is that a "minefield"?!?!?!? I really dont understand this comment. Do you want to just say you hate America? Go ahead and say it for the record. And go on defending nations like IRAN and China.






Lets just make one thing clear so we all understand and are in agreement. CHINA CP does not play by the "rules". They steal intellectual property, unleash Covid upon the world, say it originated from a market in the city... Doesnt seem fair to me...


As for ticket sellers. are you talking about something like Ticketmaster? Ya idk seems like the prices are similar to what they were 12 years ago, inflated some. But you are forgetting one thing these services provide. when you purchase thru them you are getting a verified ticket and not a counterfeit. So that is good. There are a finite number of tickets per game, not all can go that want to probably. If the tickets go unsold, seller takes big loss. So thats good. then market correct, ticket price goes lower? I dont really understand your issue? Not everyone can go, Money gets you things and buys things you want, usually how it works. What do you suggest? Everyone who wants ticket puts name in raffle? and winners have to provide ID and fingerprints to assure they dont resell their tickets? Seems very un-american to me. Just to attend a sporting event... Remember USA is host nation, maybe just understand those coming to view are visitors and they should respect other nations and their customs. If capitalism is American, respect it and pay for the ticket, Or dont come at all and watch on your TV.

And for the record, im not a big fan of resellers or the model but they provide a service and probably make accessing tickets easier and eliminates black market scammers ripping people off. So there are some benefits.


So just to highlight what happened here. I said I would not comment on the 250 year anniversary as its a mine field (i.e. anything I say about it may result in me being flamed) you then validated my argument by projecting "Do you want to just say you hate America? Go ahead and say it for the record." so again, I am not going to comment on the 250 year anniversary, noting your bias.

Moving on...your saying the ticket prices are what they were 12 years ago, inflated some, when in fact, this is simply not true.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jun 18 2026 06:53pm
Member
Posts: 2,295
Joined: Oct 3 2010
Gold: 4,311.90
Jun 25 2026 12:53am
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7391986/2026/06/24/world-cup-pride-match-seattle-flags/

Quote
The Iran Football Federation wants FIFA to prevent any “ceremonies or promotional activities” in support of the LGBTQ+ community at a much discussed “Pride Match” between Egypt and Iran on Friday in Seattle, as well as restricting symbols or representations of the Pride movement at Lumen Field.

Since Seattle was confirmed to have a June 26 World Cup fixture, the city’s host committee has been preparing activations to mark the occasion, with the match at Lumen Field fixed as Egypt vs. Iran following the draw last December. The Seattle FWC26 committee’s website has a page dedicated to the Pride Matchday and it is holding a Pride Match Day press briefing on Thursday.

FIFA told The Athletic on Wednesday it is permitting rainbow flags at all of its World Cup matches this summer.

However, the FIFA President Gianni Infantino attempted to play down the “Pride Match” branding in an interview with the Swiss newspaper Weltwoche in January. He said: “I must clarify that there will be no ‘Pride Match’ at the (FIFA) World Cup. There will be a FIFA World Cup match in Seattle, and on the same day, events organised by external organizations will be taking place in the city. But that has nothing to do with the match itself.”


Where do our fellow chickens for kfc advocates stand on this one?
I for one rejoice at the thought of both progressives and conservatives agreeing to give the middle finger to Iran.
Member
Posts: 56,457
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 580,181.52
Jun 25 2026 04:55pm
On June 23, the U.S. allowed Iran's team to enter the country two days before their final World Cup match - instead of the one-day window imposed for their first two games. Why the change? Easy. By then, Iran had already lost twice and been knocked out. They were harmless. If the U.S. truly believed Iranian players posed a security risk, that risk wouldn't disappear because of two football losses. But once Iran could no longer advance, there was no longer any PR downside to being "generous." The strict one-day rule, the visa bans for 15 officials, the forced return to Mexico after every match - all of that was in place while Iran still mattered. The moment they didn't, the rules magically eased. That's not security. That's pettiness.

Either keep it at 2 days and stick with your story of security risk, or do this and be seen to be petty.
Member
Posts: 17,358
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 12,842.80
Jun 25 2026 06:53pm
On June 23, the U.S. allowed Iran's team to enter the country two days before their final World Cup match - instead of the one-day window imposed for their first two games. Why the change? Easy. By then, Iran had already lost twice and been knocked out. They were harmless. If the U.S. truly believed Iranian players posed a security risk, that risk wouldn't disappear because of two football losses. But once Iran could no longer advance, there was no longer any PR downside to being "generous." The strict one-day rule, the visa bans for 15 officials, the forced return to Mexico after every match - all of that was in place while Iran still mattered. The moment they didn't, the rules magically eased. That's not security. That's pettiness.

Either keep it at 2 days and stick with your story of security risk, or do this and be seen to be petty.


Faulty information leads to faulty conclusions.

Iran, like all of the shitty teams that shouldn't be there, plays with 10 defenders against any competent team and tries their little hearts out for ties. They have two ties so far, they have not lost twice as you claimed and they have not been knocked out. The world cup starts in the third round, it's a weird joke until then with all these terrible teams. They are in second place in their group with one game left to play, even a third place finish gives them a chance to advance, because, again, this world cup is a joke until rd 3.

48 teams is way too many.

But srs, if you don't watch soccer that's fine. Everyone calls me gay for liking it, yer probably better off. You decided that there was a conspiracy and invented facts to prove it. Anyone can google Iran's world cup standing and see that you made all this up tho...



Also fk Brazil

and I hope England doesn't play Scotland next. I don't have any idea how the dumb system they're using works but apparently it's a possibility.

This post was edited by Shadowoffury on Jun 25 2026 07:20pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567810Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll