Before 2005, Israel maintained permanent civilian settlements inside the Gaza Strip, requiring a massive, static military presence to protect specific enclaves. What I am describing is the post-ISIS Mosul or post-WWII model: no civilian settlements, no permanent military administration governing daily life, but complete security freedom of action to enter, neutralize a cell, and leave.
You ask why this would succeed now when containment failed before. The answer is simple: Containment is what failed. For twenty years, the international community forced Israel to accept a 'quiet for quiet' status quo, letting Hamas build a massive state sponsored military fortress on our border. October 7th proved that containment is a fatal delusion. The baseline has completely shifted; the Israeli public and military now understand that total security control is an absolute prerequisite for survival. It’s not about a lack of 'willingness' to police Gaza it is an existential necessity.
Furthermore, you claim Israel won't 'revisit the relationship with the Palestinians.' Israel has repeatedly shown it is willing to forge new regional realities, as it did with the Abraham Accords. The barrier to changing the relationship has never been Israeli willingness; it has been the absolute refusal of Palestinian leadership to accept a Jewish state in any borders.
Israel does not want to run Gaza's schools, pave its roads, or manage its hospitals. That is exactly why my plan relies on non Hamas civilian technocrats and regional Arab partners to handle governance and reconstruction. But Israel will absolutely maintain the keys to the security border. We tried outsourcing our security to international frameworks and walls; it led to the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. We are never doing it again
"In my opinion". (and leaving morality at the door).
That plan does not seem credible for the outcome Israel wants. You speak about control but if Israel does not govern Gaza, Israel is are not in control and Israel is leaving a door open for history to repeat itself. If Israel does not govern Gaza, then Israel runs the real risk of history repeating itself. If we look at the last 2+ years of war I can't find markers to support the viability of such a plan. Someone has to govern Gaza. If it isn't Israel, then it will be local actors with their own interests, loyalties, and agendas. Either Israel governs Gaza, and accepts the cost/effort, or Israel does not accepts the real risk of history repeating itself.
On reading several articles on line, I see now that this is one of the official Israeli "plans", but that the debate rages on. In my humble opinion, this plan sucks.
This post was edited by ferdia on Jun 4 2026 02:35am