You have yet to disprove the title your chance to explain how a blade of grass is proof of your so-called jesus is yet to be demonstrated. Instead of taking an opportunity of presenting proof yoou hide behind whataboutisms and deflections.
It is not my job to disprove your god because he hasn't been demonstrated to exist. You are trying to flip the burden of proof because you know that your religion is fake nothing burger. So get busy proving.
Let's assume there was a guy named jesus who got nailed to a cross and shroud of Turin is a real deal how does that prove he was a god, resurrected or performed any of his magic/miracles?
Even though we know there were hundreds if not thousand different cults, mystery schools and various religions being made up during that time. Romans used to nail a shit load lot of people to a cross there were mass graves of them getting tortured and persecuted.
It could've been literally anyone. Using a shroud of Turin as evidence for jesus is like using an old rug to identify Aladdin.
Maybe rethink your life choices before its too late.
argument from ignorance got you walking back?
blade of grass (we could use any form of living matter) by definition is supernatural and hard proof of the creation narrative
apparently you have a commitment to 'atheism and your mind is so locked you wont even accept standard definitions
so i am prepared to do this every day. you deny such a definition exists or some other such jibber and i will just keep repeating myself
super·nat·ural
[ˌsuːpəˈnatʃ(ə)r(ə)l]
adjective
noun
supernatural (adjective)
(of a manifestation or event)
attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature:"a supernatural being"
Similar:
paranormal
psychic
magic
magical
occult
mystic
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'atheist making the admission that they are unscientificevolutionary biologist Richard Lewontin, who wrote in 1997:
“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just‑so stories,
because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter‑intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for
we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door” A-Z Quotes+1.
This post was edited by TiStuff on May 6 2026 01:33am