d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Christianity Is Obviously Fake
Prev1225226227228229269Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 46,807
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 5 2026 08:11am
How do you know when they follow "his" teachings?


This might sound even crazier but if you genuinely care about someone you wouldn't stoop down so low as to nitpick obvious typos and aggressively try to dodge explaining how a leaf is proof of jesus. Lets be honest you are triggered and probably waiting to spam report button as soon as you see my post.

I made a simple request prove your magic claims or go kick rocks.

Now get busy my so called "genuinely caring christian"


how do you learn anything about anybody?

it was funny asking for a meme when you said "earth is center of the earth" stop being such a victim
actually i said a blade of grass but leaf will do. go find a science lab ask them to make you a leaf. LMK how it goes
why would it be spam?

make a leaf or go kick rocks yourself

your a typical 'atheist abusive leftie azzhol but we still care about you. ............ya i know it doesnt make sense, doesnt make sense to me either :)

This post was edited by TiStuff on May 5 2026 08:16am
Member
Posts: 16,001
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
May 5 2026 02:02pm
how do you learn anything about anybody?

it was funny asking for a meme when you said "earth is center of the earth" stop being such a victim
actually i said a blade of grass but leaf will do. go find a science lab ask them to make you a leaf. LMK how it goes
why would it be spam?

make a leaf or go kick rocks yourself

your a typical 'atheist abusive leftie azzhol but we still care about you. ............ya i know it doesnt make sense, doesnt make sense to me either :)


I am not asking a scientist, I am asking you specifically to explain to me how a blade of grass is proof of jesus since you made the claim? Genuinely caring christian dodging again because he cannot back up the lies.

Because it's not physically possible.
It's also not physically possible for the heliocentric model to be your reality.

The globe model must spin a specific direction in order to be in motion. As soon as you incorporate the stars into that model it fails because of star rotation. The stars oppose each other in each hemisphere.
That's why no globe model or any fake moon footage have stars rotation included. They can't.

Remember in science and geometry there is an X axis. An X axis wouldn't even exist if we were on a globe. It wouldn't be a practical concept whatsoever.

Also the globe model requires a point of singularity. At the core. This would cause the physical laws to cease to function.

Antarctica experiences 24hr sunlight. This is not possible on a globe model. Otherwise the other hemisphere would be in 24hrs darkness which isn't what happens.

And at times in the sky we can see both the sun and the moon at the same time. Like a day time moon. The heliocentric model can not incorporate this observation. This would require an absence of photons in the opposing hemisphere which is not scientifically possible.


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

This post was edited by addone on May 5 2026 02:04pm
Member
Posts: 46,807
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 5 2026 02:45pm
I am not asking a scientist, I am asking you specifically to explain to me how a blade of grass is proof of jesus since you made the claim? Genuinely caring christian dodging again because he cannot back up the lies.



:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


scientist would look at you like your crazy.
blade of grass far more complex then anything man has ever made. so who made it?
Member
Posts: 16,001
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
May 5 2026 03:24pm
scientist would look at you like your crazy.
blade of grass far more complex then anything man has ever made. so who made it?


Argument from ignorance
Stop deflecting to scientists and answer the question "how is a blade of grass proof of jesus?"


Member
Posts: 46,807
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 5 2026 07:47pm
Argument from ignorance
Stop deflecting to scientists and answer the question "how is a blade of grass proof of jesus?"


ok then the title of your thread "Christianity Is Obviously Fake" is an argument from ignorance.
Member
Posts: 19,148
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
May 5 2026 08:57pm
Argument from ignorance
Stop deflecting to scientists and answer the question "how is a blade of grass proof of jesus?"


Irony.
Member
Posts: 7,490
Joined: Aug 14 2023
Gold: 33,872.00
May 5 2026 10:49pm
Google the "Tucker Carlson Show" and keywords "The Shroud of Turin" and riddle me how that's a thing. I was the most resistant human to faith imaginable, took me years of being proven wrong and doing my own research into everything to have a change of heart. Don't knock it til you try it bud. Big Banging out of nothingness is pretty far fetched imo. A much bigger leap of faith to believe in absolutely Nothing over something. Even Google backs it up. The odds of all of this coming out of some act of randomness is a massive long shot.
Member
Posts: 16,001
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
May 6 2026 12:25am
ok then the title of your thread "Christianity Is Obviously Fake" is an argument from ignorance.


You have yet to disprove the title your chance to explain how a blade of grass is proof of your so-called jesus is yet to be demonstrated. Instead of taking an opportunity of presenting proof yoou hide behind whataboutisms and deflections.
It is not my job to disprove your god because he hasn't been demonstrated to exist. You are trying to flip the burden of proof because you know that your religion is fake nothing burger. So get busy proving.


Google the "Tucker Carlson Show" and keywords "The Shroud of Turin" and riddle me how that's a thing. I was the most resistant human to faith imaginable, took me years of being proven wrong and doing my own research into everything to have a change of heart. Don't knock it til you try it bud. Big Banging out of nothingness is pretty far fetched imo. A much bigger leap of faith to believe in absolutely Nothing over something. Even Google backs it up. The odds of all of this coming out of some act of randomness is a massive long shot.


Let's assume there was a guy named jesus who got nailed to a cross and shroud of Turin is a real deal how does that prove he was a god, resurrected or performed any of his magic/miracles?

Even though we know there were hundreds if not thousand different cults, mystery schools and various religions being made up during that time. Romans used to nail a shit load lot of people to a cross there were mass graves of them getting tortured and persecuted.
It could've been literally anyone. Using a shroud of Turin as evidence for jesus is like using an old rug to identify Aladdin.

Maybe rethink your life choices before its too late.

This post was edited by addone on May 6 2026 12:26am
Member
Posts: 46,807
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 6 2026 01:28am
You have yet to disprove the title your chance to explain how a blade of grass is proof of your so-called jesus is yet to be demonstrated. Instead of taking an opportunity of presenting proof yoou hide behind whataboutisms and deflections.
It is not my job to disprove your god because he hasn't been demonstrated to exist. You are trying to flip the burden of proof because you know that your religion is fake nothing burger. So get busy proving.




Let's assume there was a guy named jesus who got nailed to a cross and shroud of Turin is a real deal how does that prove he was a god, resurrected or performed any of his magic/miracles?

Even though we know there were hundreds if not thousand different cults, mystery schools and various religions being made up during that time. Romans used to nail a shit load lot of people to a cross there were mass graves of them getting tortured and persecuted.
It could've been literally anyone. Using a shroud of Turin as evidence for jesus is like using an old rug to identify Aladdin.

Maybe rethink your life choices before its too late.


argument from ignorance got you walking back?
blade of grass (we could use any form of living matter) by definition is supernatural and hard proof of the creation narrative
apparently you have a commitment to 'atheism and your mind is so locked you wont even accept standard definitions
so i am prepared to do this every day. you deny such a definition exists or some other such jibber and i will just keep repeating myself
super·nat·ural
[ˌsuːpəˈnatʃ(ə)r(ə)l]

adjective

noun
supernatural (adjective)
(of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature:
"a supernatural being"
Similar:
paranormal
psychic
magic
magical
occult
mystic
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'atheist making the admission that they are unscientific
evolutionary biologist Richard Lewontin, who wrote in 1997:
“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just‑so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter‑intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door” A-Z Quotes+1.

This post was edited by TiStuff on May 6 2026 01:33am
Member
Posts: 16,001
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
May 6 2026 01:54am
argument from ignorance got you walking back?
blade of grass (we could use any form of living matter) by definition is supernatural and hard proof of the creation narrative
apparently you have a commitment to 'atheism and your mind is so locked you wont even accept standard definitions
so i am prepared to do this every day. you deny such a definition exists or some other such jibber and i will just keep repeating myself
super·nat·ural
[ˌsuːpəˈnatʃ(ə)r(ə)l]

adjective

noun
supernatural (adjective)
(of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature:
"a supernatural being"
Similar:
paranormal
psychic
magic
magical
occult
mystic
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'atheist making the admission that they are unscientific
evolutionary biologist Richard Lewontin, who wrote in 1997:
“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just‑so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter‑intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door” A-Z Quotes+1.


Fail

No grass isn't supernatural its natural plant found around the globe earth. Performing mental gymnastics by rearranging what words mean isn't going to save you from demonstrating how a blade of grass is proof of your so called jesus.

Try again.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1225226227228229269Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll