When you start describing a nation’s very existence as "inherently sick," you’ve stopped talking about politics and started using the language of dehumanization. That’s not a critique of a government or a policy; it’s an admission that your issue isn’t with what Israel does, but with the fact that it is.
The "sickness" you’re describing is actually a people’s refusal to remain a stateless minority subject to the whims of others. For two thousand years, that was the status quo, and it ended in a century of unprecedented slaughter. If building a sovereign, high-tech democracy in their ancestral homeland to ensure they are never victims again is "sick" to you, then you’re simply proving my point: you don't want a "solution," you want a world where Israel doesn't exist.
History shows that when people start labeling an entire nation or ethnicity as a "sickness," they are usually the ones justifying the next round of violence. If you want peace, you have to accept the reality of the other side’s existence. If your starting point is that their existence is a disease, then you aren't part of a conversation you’re part of the problem
spare me the chatGPT bullshit, israel has been dehumanizing palestinians and lebanese for decades. treat others as you wish to be treated, right? not for the israelis, they think they are above the laws of man AND God