It applies to my original point. I used that example as you claim to be an individual who believes in "evidence"
When you take something out of context it has no value.
You have people debating the bible that actually discuss the bibles contents. They have knowledge of the bible and challenge it while not twisting any form of it to fit this narrative you are after
It's one thing to take setting you don't agree with and explain why, but it's about to have no knowledge of it and lie to fit your narrative.
Well you are claiming this "god" of yours is real and true I call bullshit. The contents of the bible cannot be taken seriously until they are proven otherwise.
Anyone can make up more bullshit to explain original bullshit in an endless loop. Therefore talking about the contents of the bible are merely a side quest. You need to step away from making unsupported claims and present the actual proof which is the main quest.
So why are you so aggressively avoiding to provide proof? Is it perhaps you have nothing?

Perhaps you should watch The Case For Christ. Or you can go to the HolyLandSite domain and sign up to go and see these things for yourself. The proof you are looking for requires you to get up and go.
I don't think you understand what proof actually is.
