Not what I asked. Simple question yet too dishonest to answer it yourself.

I see this thread has progressed into interesting debates. Hopefully I am not too exhausted after work to post.

You fail to answer lots of very simple questions yourself. You are not very good at what you are trying to do.

Yeah, you already said that. Thx for that bit, mate. Whatever your head makes up, be happy with it.

There rsrely is a simple question religious people ask. Its usually a dimb question. Almost always.

Funny thing, you guys know what got me a timeout? Me saying "because my parents f*****".

Did mods become a little more strict lately?

actually its a lot better. i been suspended for a lot less. hard to believe you think that was okay to say. fyi its supposed to be a family site



your religion is what ypu believe by faith/trust. there are various levels of faith /trust

lets look at your post #1727


you gobbled that down like baby bird. didnt question anything about it. o so much faith you installed it in the fact column in your mind. never bothering to check anything about it or the people behind it. in fact you doubled down and made a bunch of mocking and scoffing stories, baseless religion if i ever saw it.

lets look at a specific one from my list
lucy - Australopithecus afarensis
the most famous fossil in 'evolution 'atheist history
lets cover two parts. a fossil 40% intact. thats its a partial fossil is whats important. thats were the 'atheist magic thrives. the fossil was missing hands and feet. when they reconstructed it they put human hands and human feet on it. you just accept that? and you going to mock other people?


This post was edited by TiStuff on Apr 10 2026 03:34am

Awesome from you to bring that up again, because its a wonderful example of what science is compared to religious faith.

This isnt just a wild guess. I am not just putting my faith in this hoping it to be true as if it does something for me. Its just something that seems very likely based on evidence.

While the Universes age of roughly a little less than 14 billion years is not 100% proven, it is very likely true. Theres actually explanations for this, you know? Thats the difference between a scientific theory and religious ideas.

Scientists (pretty much all of them from that field) are quite confident that the universe is about 13.8 billion years old because multiple independent methods all point to the same result.

1.The cosmic microwave background (the afterglow of the early universe) provides a very precise snapshot of the universe shortly after the Big Bang.

2. The expansion of the universe (measured by how fast galaxies move away from each other) can be traced backward to estimate when everything was much closer together.

3. The oldest stars and star clusters are around 13 billion years old, setting a lower limit.

These methods use different physics but give consistent answers, which increases confidence.

While it’s not absolute proof, the agreement between these measurements makes the estimate highly reliable with only small uncertainty.

Thats why I go with it, because it makes sense. Which is important, believe it or not.

This post was edited by Kaltrato on Apr 10 2026 04:06am

What a stupid post.... all religions are fake
And god no exist is a human invention...
So to me islam,Cristian or any other religión It's a business to get rich off the ignorant and fearful

Well.... you are not entirely wrong.
There are good reasons as to why you think that way.

That being said, religion is based on faith and depending which part of the world you are in, those religions and beliefs have given millions of people succor and comfort during times of hardship.
So it is what it is.

Religion is also extremely dangerous.. I believe the total death count that religion took and I mean a combination of all religion that we know, let's say since 2000 years back is far greater than any death from political ideology.