d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Pete Hegseth Quiting ?
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 17,030
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 6,462.52
Mar 24 2026 03:24pm
you didn't understand my post. i didnt ask "what war crimes has the regime done" i asked "what war crimes can you charge pete with". Pete is a member of the chain of command, he's not the commander. And most of his job responsibilities involve procuring funding, allocating that funding, and shifting resources between branches of the military.

even if a credible war crime charge was brought to international court, they'd just scapegoat someone else.

im not sure if you've missed it but no one has ever really been taken out by war crime charges. people are charged for war crimes after the lose wars and their governments are toppled.

even in context all they'd have to do is take some small number of prisoners, and that demonstrates his statements were just rhetoric. imo you should remove the phrase "war crimes" almost entirely from your vocabulary, its just buzzwords, its never enforced. the UN is a joke, always has been.


The USA is not a member and does not recognize the authority of the International Kangaroo Court. They have no ability to charge anyone with anything. ^doomchaser is reading and writing fanfic


Look two idiots that do not know how to read..
Legal Context: International humanitarian law, including the "Hague Convention of 1907", explicitly forbids declaring that "no quarter" will be given. Such a declaration is considered a war crime because it effectively orders the killing of anyone who attempts to surrender.

We are not the only country in the world that decides what a war crime is or is not..WTF are you two on about?? Pete is in a possition of power over our military... We charged Germans with war crimes besides Hitler ... So saying he cannot be charged with a war crime or stating "We are the only ones that make the law in the world is just a joke.. Two numnuts that just say might makes right.. lol what ever dudes
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 24 2026 03:30pm
Look two idiots that do not know how to read..
Legal Context: International humanitarian law, including the "Hague Convention of 1907", explicitly forbids declaring that "no quarter" will be given. Such a declaration is considered a war crime because it effectively orders the killing of anyone who attempts to surrender.

We are not the only country in the world that decides what a war crime is or is not..WTF are you two on about?? Pete is in a possition of power over our military... We charged Germans with war crimes besides Hitler ... So saying he cannot be charged with a war crime or stating "We are the only ones that make the law in the world is just a joke.. Two numnuts that just say might makes right.. lol what ever dudes


Again, America is not a member and does not recognize the authority of the ICC. You are wrong. We ARE the only ones that make laws that relate to the American military.

If all the ineffectual Europeans somehow manage to invade and defeat America like we did to Germany then yes, obviously they could charge Americans for war crimes or whatever else they want. That's not really in the realm of possibility tho, so as I said you are reading and writing fanfic.
Member
Posts: 17,030
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 6,462.52
Mar 24 2026 03:37pm
Again, America is not a member and does not recognize the authority of the ICC. You are wrong. We ARE the only ones that make laws that relate to the American military.

If all the ineffectual Europeans somehow manage to invade and defeat America like we did to Germany then yes, obviously they could charge Americans for war crimes or whatever else they want. That's not really in the realm of possibility tho, so as I said you are reading and writing fanfic.


Well lets say a lot of our troops get killed and we vote in others that are willing to charge this administration for their war crimes.. Not impossible just unlikely ..Better to have a pardon then not ...And If Trump does not get us all killed.. or destroy the world.. I'm sure the pardons will be handed out. ..but spread your bs and say i the fanfic one lol :rofl:
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 24 2026 03:41pm
Well lets say a lot of our troops get killed and we vote in others that are willing to charge this administration for their war crimes.. Not impossible just unlikely ..Better to have a pardon then not ...And If Trump does not get us all killed.. or destroy the world.. I'm sure the pardons will be handed out. ..but spread your bs and say i the fanfic one lol :rofl:


An American court could charge Americans. That's not what you were saying.

The "international laws" you were quoting are entirely inapplicable. International courts do not have the authority to charge Americans.

I don't know what you're having a hard time with here, it's all very simple.
Member
Posts: 17,030
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 6,462.52
Mar 24 2026 03:48pm
An American court could charge Americans. That's not what you were saying.

The "international laws" you were quoting are entirely inapplicable. International courts do not have the authority to charge Americans.

I don't know what you're having a hard time with here, it's all very simple.


What do you call a war crime? Only American laws? the laws are made internationally ...What are you saying dude? I call a war crime a war crime... You are saying they are not war crimes? you lost me
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 24 2026 03:57pm
What do you call a war crime? Only American laws? the laws are made internationally ...What are you saying dude? I call a war crime a war crime... You are saying they are not war crimes? you lost me


Try reading these words.

America is not a member and does not recognize the authority of the International Criminal Court.

The ICC can not charge Americans with war crimes or anything else.

The only laws that apply to Pete Hegseth are American laws. The only courts that can try him are American courts.

This post was edited by Shadowoffury on Mar 24 2026 04:00pm
Member
Posts: 21,958
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Mar 24 2026 04:07pm
I hope that fox news host get's kicked to the curb.

His fox new propagandized training is obnoxious in interviews.
Member
Posts: 57,214
Joined: Oct 14 2010
Gold: 57,480.92
Mar 24 2026 04:26pm
Good.
He can go back to his 9-5 drunken benders with his other racist buddies.
Member
Posts: 17,030
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 6,462.52
Mar 24 2026 04:30pm
Try reading these words.

America is not a member and does not recognize the authority of the International Criminal Court.

The ICC can not charge Americans with war crimes or anything else.

The only laws that apply to Pete Hegseth are American laws. The only courts that can try him are American courts.


ok when did i say he just broke International laws? When did I say he should be prosecuted by a International Criminal Court?

Hegseth is accused of ordering a second, "follow-up" strike on survivors of an initial U.S. military attack on a suspected drug-smuggling boat off the coast of Venezuela
Legal experts and lawmakers, including members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, have scrutinized this as a potential war crime (killing individuals who are shipwrecked or no longer active combatants).
Member
Posts: 744
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 1,685.00
Mar 24 2026 04:46pm
So sad to see americans being like "yeah who cares if we become n@zis its not like we signed a deal not to, try and stop us".

I predict groud invasion of us within my lifetime at this rate. You guys are gonna trigger NATO and think that a bunch of military equipment from the cold war is gonna save u from getting all ur imports droned or from civilian resistance groups rising up. What happened to freedom and liberty? Isn't that what the chuds were all about? Now its blindly trust the government even when they target your fellow civilians?

If u guys really think liberal way of life is such a threat to your freedom why are you removing all the checks and balances that enable liberty and freedom? If you are worried about kamala and Biden overreach why did you elect someone who wants Supreme authority not even granted to the english monarch you rose against to form your country? What if you lose the next election and you've handed over all this power to arrest whoever you want and bomb whoever you want with impunity to the people youre afraid of? There was a social contract and now u guys break it, and the consequences of breaking it mean you have to keep doubling down. Where will it end? Will Canada become terrorists if they refuse your demands? Will Denmark? Will u?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll