Ahhh, so the Anti-Christ has a human form now?

we're gonna see some serious shit. Rabbis all over Israel are claiming that the Jewish Messiah will be announced this month. We can already see the Zionists making moves to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound which is Islam's third-holiest site in Jerusalem, built over the site of the ancient Jewish First and Second Temples, known as the Temple Mount. According to Jewish Eschatology, this temple must be destroyed and will be where the Third Temple is to be rebuilt under the watch of their Messiah. Destruction of this Mosque will cause much of the Muslim world to declare holy war or Jihad.
-
According to Judaic Eschatology, the Jewish diaspora will return to Israel before the final battle and fight a losing war against "a gathering of global nations", only to be saved by their "Conqueror Messiah" who keeps them from total destruction while the world around them burns.
According to Christian and Islamist Eschatology, this Messiah figure is the antichrist (dajjal) who will perform false miracles and wonders. In both religions, Jesus (Isa) returns with an army of angels and slaughters the antichrist and his legions while liberating humanity.
According to Masonic lore, a conflict will be engineered between these three religions to bring about a time of great pain and strife. After much death and destruction, and all sides wear themselves thin, a new order is to present itself and rule all with the doctrine of light. This is also known as Luciferianism. The New Enlightenment.
-
I just want to know... why is this being engineered to happen now? Why is Israel so confident it can take on the world, and win. How is their Messiah supposed to help them. What power would this antichrist have over the armies of the world? It seems suicidal unless they know something we don't.
But then you read Christian and Islamic Eschatological lore, and you realize they are supposed to lose... and the Christians and Islamists are in many cases just as sure that their Messiah will come and destroy the false one...
And then finally the Masonic game plan published by Albert Pike... all the way back in 1871, to cause a global war between the Abrahamic religions and then insert themselves as saviors, establishing both a new government and theological religious system at the same time.

All 3 of these sound absolutely insane. But at this point, I have a hard time not seeing what is happening as the beginning of this process.


Recommended viewing:

you?

The last seven presidents have had a stated commitment of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons at any cost, this isn't out of nowhere.

"We got rid of a more moderate head believe it or not who put a ban on nuclear weapon"

Lol I keep seeing people say this sort of thing. What on earth could have convinced you that Khomeini was in any way moderate? There's probably no less apt description for the man, he was a religious extremist dictator who openly funded terrorism around the world and put his own people to the sword... "Moderate"

You are deluding yourself if you don't think Iran stockpiling 60% enriched uranium was a problem.

You need to read better

I didn’t say he was “a moderate” I said he was “more moderate” than his younger replacement

If you differ with that point you also disagree with the White House DNI btw

I disagree with this being a point at all. "There's someone worse" is not a reason to let an insane person acquire nuclear weapons.

I wonder if you genuinely believe what you are writing, do you think Iran was actually close to acquiring or making nuclear weapons? If you think the answer is yes, you are also at odds with the US Intelligence director. Nuclear enrichment by itself is not illegal and we only had eyes on it 24 hours of the day to ensure nothing nefarious was happening - for the last 2 decades

You're going to have to be more clear. Are you saying you don't think they were stockpiling 60% HEU?

They were, and yes, this is about as close as you can get without actually making nuclear weapons.

They didn't need to enrich over 3.67% for energy or research.

Uranium enrichment is the only major barrier to creating nuclear weapons today and they got 97%+ of the way there before we stepped in. Yes, that is close. Obviously.

What "nefarious" things could we have been watching for if not this exactly?

Nefarious is obviously implying nuclear weapon production, not just the potential to because of nuclear enrichment capability

But I am not even going to engage unless you are actually wanting to have a good faith conversation. You need to go back to your initial response and answer

1. Is the replacement head of Iran more radical than the previous? (Y/N only)
2. Does having a more radical leader increase or decrease risk of conflict escalation? (Does or does not only)
3. Do you believe this conflict is from a legitimate, American, concern for Iranian nuclear weapons? In other words is this variable ONE of the factors that lead to our most recent involvement (Y/N)

This post was edited by Bazi on Mar 21 2026 02:25pm

See, that's the flawed logic they were relying on. "They aren't making nuclear weapons, they're just getting closer and closer so we can't do anything" It was explicitly a threat.

1. Again, this is not a point. No one who attempted to assassinate Hitler worried that someone worse may take over. Khomeini was top tier radical.

2. Not necessarily, obviously. Ho Chi Minh was pretty radical and he did everything he could to prevent war with America.

3. Yes, obviously.


Now answer my question. You implied that Iran was not close to acquiring nuclear weapons in your last post, is that what you truly believe? Do you not think they were stockpiling 60% HEU or you accept this and still somehow insist this is not close to acquiring nuclear weapons?