You are using another's opinion/post to copy and paste.

You have not pursued Jesus on your own and have not read the word in its entirety. You have not walked by faith to learn who he is, who you are, and how you should live to fulfill your purpose for others.

It isn't False that you are not using your own arguments.

1. Charles Darwin and the theory of 'evolution- gets a pass because he didnt call it fact
2.haeckels embryo drawings- 1874- early detected fraud- mass reprinted in textbooks as "proof" for 'evolution. 'atheists "the super logic minds" never did chit to challenge this. when do 'atheists actually become "scientific" as opposed to just "agenda" based liars
3rd piltdown man 1912- 'atheists hold themselves on high claiming to be the greatest critical thinkers that ever graced the world- longest running fraud in the history of modern science. the real mystery is how these clowns ever became the face of modern science?
4th nebraska man 1922- a master work of 'atheist imagination figuring out stuff........
5th whale evolution. incomplete fossils are the best kind of fossils. in fact the worse condition a fossil is in the better it proves 'evolution for some reason? as we will see more of this 'atheist magic in later posts


1980's
RNA WORLD HYPOTHESIS was the 'atheists darling to abiogenesis. O and how smug the 'atheists were guffawing and pushing it in everyones face.
the lack of being scientific rigorous when the experiment (that it already passed peer reviewed?) was tested for "repeatable" it miserably failed and was retracted.
the 'atheist clown show repeated it self once again. being sloppy in science methodology and now has contaminated the peer review process.
but i can give some credit as the person responsible for the paper said in a rare honest moment rarely seen in 'atheist science.


‘RNA World’ Paper Retracted
https://larshaukeland.com/bits-pieces/scientific-articles/rna-world-paper-retracted/

I take it you have no counter defense then and would rather cry about the source instead of addressing the essence of the question. Good to know.

any of you ever seen anything like this before?
'atheists hate this stuff because its a humanoid with larger brain which would mean that something could be smarter then them. so they lie about it and say its head binding or from cradle boarding

The Elongated Skulls of Peru - An Ancient Mystery


This post was edited by TiStuff on Mar 16 2026 05:26pm

why would atheists be opposed to something smarter than them existing?

personally im almost 100% sure there is a smarter lifeform than human in the universe, irrespective of whether there is a god or which one it is. just probability and scale, like doing 100 trillion cow runs u will eventually pop out a rune higher than human

I used to think like this until I actually learned statistics & statistical mechanics

The probability of life self-assembling, based on known kinetic rate laws, over the course of the universe's 13 billion year age, across the finite number of planets in the universe, is infintessimally close to zero. In terms of numbers with respect to probabilities of this scale, 13 billion years is absolutely tiny.

This means that there might be lifeforms out there, but God had to also have created them. Which could be true or not, but we have zero reason to believe it to be true. You could also estimate the statical probability of another Earth-like planet out there which is also essentially zero.

This post was edited by El1te on Mar 16 2026 05:38pm

ego

they be ok if it was 'aliens. it just cant be God or found in the fossil record. if larger brain humans were found in fossil that would mean evolution went downward and they insist on being the pinnacle of 'evolution, they would no longer be "the brights"

Brights movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brights_movement

This post was edited by TiStuff on Mar 16 2026 05:39pm

Don't understand how universe was formed and want to pretend like you do?
Its easy become a Christian where any gap in out current understanding fill it up with god/magic. Any difficult questions like what happened billions/trillions of years ago just assume it was jesus and his magic powers..
That way you don't have to think about it. Switch your reason off and just accept a 2000 year old book written by bronze age grifters.

If anyone asks you for actual proof you don't ever provide it instead refer them to the bible and use grade school arguments like we exist therefore something more "intelligenter" made us.
If its good enough for cavemen its good enough for us.

I don't think you understand the pure size we're talking here. There are estimated to be 10 billion trillion planets in the universe suitable for life. The odds that we are the smartest thing to emerge out of all that is close to 0.

What? The universe was created in an instant, all mass-energy, and then immediately began to expand, this is supported by all science

You are a jew