Quote (TiStuff @ Mar 11 2026 12:57pm)

we are going to take a journey through time. we will see what the 'atheist really has. if you ever got tired of the 'atheist braggarts? your imagination this your imagination that. we are going to see where imaginary woowoo really comes from :)

1. Charles Darwin and the theory of 'evolution- gets a pass because he didnt call it fact

2.haeckels embroyo drawings- 1874
this is a really weird one. he was found to be a fraud right at the beginning and he had to resign from the university he worked at.
but then some how his drawings kept being printed in text books as "proof" of evolution. for near a century
one would think that the 'atheists being the pinnacle of reason would object to such misuse. nope ........ i guess they are all frauds?
on a side note. this man was an exceptional artist. his work is still collected. yet his legacy is the chit embryo drawings.

supporting data
ERNST HAECKEL EMBRYO DRAWING A FRAUD– STILL USED IN TEXTBOOKS
https://www.evolutionisamyth.com/biological/ernst-haeckel-embryo-drawing-a-fraud-still-used-in-textbooks/
Lessons Learned from Haeckel and His Drawings: We Shouldn’t Always Believe What the “Leading Experts” Tell Us about Evolution
https://evolutionnews.org/2007/06/lessons_learned_from_haeckel_a/

Revisiting Those Pesky Embryo Drawings | Evolution News
evolutionnews.org › Science › Evolution
Jun 17, 2010 - ... century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks! Gould ...
excerpt
"do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks!"
-Stephen Jay Gould

Ernst Haeckel's 1874 embryo drawings
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/2ACJAKG/one-of-the-most-controversial-drawings-in-evolutionary-biology-this-is-ernst-haeckels-own-drawing-of-a-series-of-embryos-from-the-german-first-edit-2ACJAKG.jpg

a sample of his true talent
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/107_haeckel-1460x2048.jpg

Quote (Rowboatz @ Mar 12 2026 09:08am)

Now I'm just genuinely curious...

Do you believe that if you walked outside and sat there while eating food and drinking water for a couple of days you'd instantly just die?

Quote (sirthom @ Mar 12 2026 09:10am)

I believe facts.
Not sure why you dont.
Be sure to let the class know how that works out for you.

The report, Global Burden of Disease of Solar Ultraviolet Radiation estimates that up to 60,000 deaths a year worldwide are caused by too much exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR).

Quote (addone @ Mar 11 2026 02:52pm)

After wrongfully killing 25 innocent people in the Salem Witch Trials (1692–1693) the testimony of seing spirits or spectre evidence is no longer admissible in court and requires physical, tangible proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_evidence


Federal Rule of Evidence 610
"Evidence of a witness’s religious beliefs or opinions is not admissible to attack or support the witness’s credibility."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_610

Fail

Quote (sirthom @ Mar 12 2026 09:10am)

I believe facts.
Not sure why you dont.
Be sure to let the class know how that works out for you.

The report, Global Burden of Disease of Solar Ultraviolet Radiation estimates that up to 60,000 deaths a year worldwide are caused by too much exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR).

Quote (Rowboatz @ Mar 12 2026 11:34am)

Man, I have 100% spent a day outside in nice weather.

I'm genuinely shocked that you can dress yourself in the morning if you believe that "dying of exposure" means that people die when they sit outside with ample food and drink during normal weather.

Yeah, man, people die due to exposure to ultraviolet radiation - they die of skin cancer decades after spending days in the blistering sun without sunscreen. That's clearly irrelevant to a discussion about how you don't understand what death by exposure means lol, and the fact that you don't get this is making me increasingly concerned for your mental capacity.

I just actually want to know: have you never spent a day out in the sun? I promise you, going outside will not kill you.

Also, the definition of "death by exposure" is clear lol. It is not "dying because you went outside." Death by exposure means that somebody died because they were exposed to extreme temperatures or conditions for a prolonged period of time. Hyperthermia if too hot, hypothermia if too cold. That's why camping is possible without instantly dying. Go touch grass.

Quote (BaHgerAUT @ Mar 12 2026 01:54am)

So, where does it come from?

Quote (sirthom @ Mar 12 2026 09:36am)

Wrong again, I can put on a boat with all the fresh water and food you would ever need, but if left with zero protection....YOU WILL DIE.

Quote (majorblood @ 12 Mar 2026 17:43)

Morality is an outpouring of God's nature

Quote (Rowboatz @ Mar 12 2026 11:45am)

Moving the goalposts again - surprising.

You said, "happens in a short amount of time" and that someone will die from "simple exposure to the sun" in nice weather.

Being trapped on a boat is not that. And even if it was, you wouldn't die in a "short amount of time" if you had food and water. What kills people first when trapped on boats is dehydration.

Again, go outside and touch grass. The sun isn't going to kill you.

You can't misunderstand basic logic and be a goalpost mover - pick a struggle lol.