d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Christianity Is Obviously Fake
Prev1120121122123124278Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 46,851
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Mar 11 2026 01:34pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=subux7E_vxo

All you need to know about how Christianity is absurd and makes absolutely no sense


could you list the 17
Member
Posts: 6,599
Joined: Sep 5 2023
Gold: 3,635.67
Mar 11 2026 01:39pm
Yes.
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Mar 11 2026 01:46pm
I agree that many of our modern laws were historically influenced by Christian ethics. However, that does not mean morality itself depends on religion. Christian values, like any other moral framework, were developed and interpreted by human beings. The Bible was written by people, which suggests that humans are capable of reasoning about ethics and building moral systems themselves.

Moreover, Christianity itself does not present a single, unified set of values, different denominations and believers often interpret its teachings in very different ways.

It is true that many atrocities were committed under atheist, autocratic regimes. But religious values have not prevented similar crimes. Christian Europe still produced events like the Holocaust, in which the Nazis murdered six million Jews. History also contains many examples of violence and genocide justified by religion.

What most genocides actually seem to share is not atheism, but authoritarian leadership and unchecked power. That correlation appears far stronger than the presence or absence of religion.


Christian morality was not developed by human beings, this is incorrect and so your suggestion that objective morality can be therefore created by humans does not follow (christian morality is objective so your suggestion must also be objective morality not just preference)
Christianity does present a single, unified set of values and different denominations interpretation things different ways are not apart of the Church and are heretics, they may call themselves Christians but they simply aren't

Christianity does not justify these events, atheist regimes explicitly do justify these acts of immorality

unchecked power is exactly what atheism is, if you do not have a power above you, you make yourself God

This post was edited by majorblood on Mar 11 2026 01:52pm
Member
Posts: 6,599
Joined: Sep 5 2023
Gold: 3,635.67
Mar 11 2026 01:50pm
You skood. The post above me.

This post was edited by Haoqdlam on Mar 11 2026 01:50pm
Member
Posts: 16,021
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Mar 11 2026 01:52pm
Personal testimony is extremely powerful and relied upon in normal life and crucial in courts...... Simple AI google search... Sifting through the chaff is the real talent.


This seems like your lying. And flailing....


After wrongfully killing 25 innocent people in the Salem Witch Trials (1692–1693) the testimony of seing spirits or spectre evidence is no longer admissible in court and requires physical, tangible proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_evidence


Federal Rule of Evidence 610
"Evidence of a witness’s religious beliefs or opinions is not admissible to attack or support the witness’s credibility."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_610

Fail

This post was edited by addone on Mar 11 2026 01:54pm
Member
Posts: 6,599
Joined: Sep 5 2023
Gold: 3,635.67
Mar 11 2026 01:55pm
After wrongfully killing an innocent person in the Salem Witch Trials (1692–1693) the testimony of seing spirits or spectre evidence is no longer admissible in court and requires physical, tangible proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_evidence


Federal Rule of Evidence 610
"Evidence of a witness’s religious beliefs or opinions is not admissible to attack or support the witness’s credibility."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_610

Fail


You skood.
Member
Posts: 46,851
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Mar 11 2026 01:57pm
statements here are reasonable. its a good place to share something i have been working on for years.
lets see how the 'atheist holds up.

my story begins with the idea to find "the truth of it all" i began my quest with that simple idea. at that time there was no thought of God

perhaps it should first be stated that it has been a blessing to me to have lived this time line. i have been absolutely amazed and astounded at the things i have learned. if this process/methodology is how i became a Christian and Christianity is the truth of it all? then the red carpet was rolled out before me. the thought of a higher power doing something like this is a overwhelming idea.

lets get started

we will be revisiting 'atheist kookery as it unfolds starting from about 150 years ago
the rise and fall of the 'atheist and magical morphing monkeys.
one thing people dont know is the institution of modern science was founded by Christians.
'atheists came later, claimed science as their own through sleight of hand.
i contend 'atheism has not contributed anything of a positive nature to science, have only desecrated the institution of science, living in their imaginations and calling those imaginations "facts".

the curtain rises on a new era. 'atheism begins to make alternative claims. one of those claims is they are the minds of reason. Charles Darwin and the theory of 'evolution. that life wasn't a creation but explained by natural processes. his book "the origin of species" 1859
Darwin though he was a reasonable man. he understood the problems of his theory and he was open and honest about it. unlike the clowns that came after him who up and decided to declare 'evolution a fact.

thus the war for the institution of science began


we are going to take a journey through time. we will see what the 'atheist really has. if you ever got tired of the 'atheist braggarts? your imagination this your imagination that. we are going to see where imaginary woowoo really comes from :)

1. Charles Darwin and the theory of 'evolution- gets a pass because he didnt call it fact

2.haeckels embroyo drawings- 1874
this is a really weird one. he was found to be a fraud right at the beginning and he had to resign from the university he worked at.
but then some how his drawings kept being printed in text books as "proof" of evolution. for near a century
one would think that the 'atheists being the pinnacle of reason would object to such misuse. nope ........ i guess they are all frauds?
on a side note. this man was an exceptional artist. his work is still collected. yet his legacy is the chit embryo drawings.

supporting data
ERNST HAECKEL EMBRYO DRAWING A FRAUD– STILL USED IN TEXTBOOKS
https://www.evolutionisamyth.com/biological/ernst-haeckel-embryo-drawing-a-fraud-still-used-in-textbooks/
Lessons Learned from Haeckel and His Drawings: We Shouldn’t Always Believe What the “Leading Experts” Tell Us about Evolution
https://evolutionnews.org/2007/06/lessons_learned_from_haeckel_a/

Revisiting Those Pesky Embryo Drawings | Evolution News
evolutionnews.org › Science › Evolution
Jun 17, 2010 - ... century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks! Gould ...
excerpt
"do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks!"
-Stephen Jay Gould

Ernst Haeckel's 1874 embryo drawings


a sample of his true talent




This post was edited by TiStuff on Mar 11 2026 02:07pm
Member
Posts: 469
Joined: May 11 2023
Gold: 25.00
Mar 11 2026 03:51pm
we are going to take a journey through time. we will see what the 'atheist really has. if you ever got tired of the 'atheist braggarts? your imagination this your imagination that. we are going to see where imaginary woowoo really comes from :)

1. Charles Darwin and the theory of 'evolution- gets a pass because he didnt call it fact

2.haeckels embroyo drawings- 1874
this is a really weird one. he was found to be a fraud right at the beginning and he had to resign from the university he worked at.
but then some how his drawings kept being printed in text books as "proof" of evolution. for near a century
one would think that the 'atheists being the pinnacle of reason would object to such misuse. nope ........ i guess they are all frauds?
on a side note. this man was an exceptional artist. his work is still collected. yet his legacy is the chit embryo drawings.

supporting data
ERNST HAECKEL EMBRYO DRAWING A FRAUD– STILL USED IN TEXTBOOKS
https://www.evolutionisamyth.com/biological/ernst-haeckel-embryo-drawing-a-fraud-still-used-in-textbooks/
Lessons Learned from Haeckel and His Drawings: We Shouldn’t Always Believe What the “Leading Experts” Tell Us about Evolution
https://evolutionnews.org/2007/06/lessons_learned_from_haeckel_a/

Revisiting Those Pesky Embryo Drawings | Evolution News
evolutionnews.org › Science › Evolution
Jun 17, 2010 - ... century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks! Gould ...
excerpt
"do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks!"
-Stephen Jay Gould

Ernst Haeckel's 1874 embryo drawings
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/2ACJAKG/one-of-the-most-controversial-drawings-in-evolutionary-biology-this-is-ernst-haeckels-own-drawing-of-a-series-of-embryos-from-the-german-first-edit-2ACJAKG.jpg

a sample of his true talent
https://www.thisiscolossal.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/107_haeckel-1460x2048.jpg


Do you understand what the term 'theory' means in the context of the scientific process?

The theory of gravity is also a 'theory,' but it's backed by such a preponderance of evidence that it is functionally fact. The theory of evolution is true, and virtually every piece of peer-reviewed research supports Darwin's ideas.

It's also really weird to cite "evolutionisamyth.com" for anything lol. Your second source is basically the same thing, but they're even more nefarious. Changed their url to redirect to something that doesn't seem biased, but then they explain that their goal is to disprove "impotent theories."

If you want to talk about science, talk science. There's no reason to act like you're doing actual analysis if you're just going to grab quotes from quacks about why 99.999% of educated researchers are somehow wrong.
Member
Posts: 46,851
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Mar 11 2026 04:36pm
Do you understand what the term 'theory' means in the context of the scientific process?

The theory of gravity is also a 'theory,' but it's backed by such a preponderance of evidence that it is functionally fact. The theory of evolution is true, and virtually every piece of peer-reviewed research supports Darwin's ideas.

It's also really weird to cite "evolutionisamyth.com" for anything lol. Your second source is basically the same thing, but they're even more nefarious. Changed their url to redirect to something that doesn't seem biased, but then they explain that their goal is to disprove "impotent theories."

If you want to talk about science, talk science. There's no reason to act like you're doing actual analysis if you're just going to grab quotes from quacks about why 99.999% of educated researchers are somehow wrong.


ya i think i do
Quote
1. Charles Darwin and the theory of 'evolution- gets a pass because he didnt call it fact


peer review can merely be a circle jerk. a process for mush heads to be told what to think
"RNA world hypothesis" was "peer reviewed" 'atheists used to BRAAAAAG so much about it, it was the darling of 'evolution. eventually someone tried to repeat the claims (you mean the paper really didnt go through the scientific process) the paper was retracted.
in a rare moment of honesty the head of the research paper stated “In retrospect, we were totally blinded by our belief”
to this day that quote astounds me. its honesty, i am so used to 'atheists in science to be sleezy.

contesting the link source? why dont you contest the data in the links

are you calling Stephen Jay Gould a quack?

something to consider
he is saying they are told what to think not how to think


This post was edited by TiStuff on Mar 11 2026 04:57pm
Member
Posts: 46,851
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Mar 11 2026 05:01pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=subux7E_vxo

All you need to know about how Christianity is absurd and makes absolutely no sense


when i was on youtube. before i got cancelled for questioning the 2020 election. i would get atheists assigning me all kinds of things to read and watch. i would ask them "why dont you just teel me what the best argument is in that big o pile of stuff you read.
100% they cant tell me all the great stuff in the stuff i am supposed to read.
............its just a scam. you probably didnt even view the vid

maybe what surprised me the most.
the claims 'atheists make. how they have such great minds
its all a bull chit scam
even if "no god" the 'atheist would still be the biggest pile of bullchit in the room

This post was edited by TiStuff on Mar 11 2026 05:04pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1120121122123124278Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll