Quote (gnarjay @ Mar 5 2026 11:48am)

this isnt about Iran's nuclear capability, its about Israeli power and hegemony in the region. Netanyahu has been desperately trying to drag the US into war with Iran for 40 years and he's finally got a dog in the white house who listens to him (he's already had Congress for years)

if you sincerely believe this is about anything else, you are a complete fool !

Quote (Pyrotechx @ Mar 5 2026 08:37am)

Quote (wing_fighter2 @ Mar 5 2026 08:51am)

Should have never went to war with Iran in the first place, fuck Israel.

But we still have all these pedophiles running our government and a walking crime against humanity for a president. 🤦‍♂️

Still no justice to the Epstein survivors

Quote (TiStuff @ Mar 5 2026 12:15pm)

lefties shrieking dosnt mean something is credible

Quote (Pyrotechx @ Mar 5 2026 11:24am)

You only need common sense to see the obvious :rofl:

Make sure you edit your posts instead of spamming your TDS post after post.

Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 5 2026 06:00pm)

not to mention reducing "weeks away" to simple potential, without using intent, is silly. im a 230 pound 6 foot 2 man, so im seconds away from raping a woman. simply because i could if i chose to? absurd.

Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 5 2026 09:33am)

while this is all true, and im against iran having 60% enriched Uranium, there's something missing. why would a country want 60%? is it only to then enrich to 90%? is there zero other purpose?

of course not, its below weapons grade, but can be enriched to weapons grade quickly, in case of an invasion. having those nuclear sites was the only thing stopping Israel from attacking them for a few decades now. then we bombed the sites into a broken state. they could rebuilt but it may take a year or more. and what happened in that year? well, israel shifted instantly from "they are making a bomb, they're weeks away" to "they have too many ballistic missiles, they're going to attack us with them".

why does this matter? because from the start israel's narrative has been "iran wants a bomb to use on israel", when in reality its actually "iran wants sub-weapons grade uranium to prevent an attack from israel and the united states". they lose the uranium, they got attacked, their leader is dead, they can only really launch missiles and wait for an invasion.

and to top it off israel told us they were going to attack, knowing that our bases would be shot at in return, leaving us no choice but to strike first. to preemp a reactionary strike by iran.

Quote (ferdia @ Mar 5 2026 02:46pm)

the theme of the decade is "I thought you would harm me so i harmed you first".

Quote (gnarjay @ Mar 5 2026 12:48pm)

this isnt about Iran's nuclear capability, its about Israeli power and hegemony in the region. Netanyahu has been desperately trying to drag the US into war with Iran for 40 years and he's finally got a dog in the white house who listens to him (he's already had Congress for years)

if you sincerely believe this is about anything else, you are a complete fool !

Quote (Shadowoffury @ Mar 5 2026 03:04pm)

Yeah, obviously they were stockpiling 60% enriched uranium to use as a deterrent. They wanted to be able to strike at Israel and to support every major terrorist organization in the world without repercussion.

They weren’t stopping at 60% because they don’t want nuclear weapons though. If America had found out they were enriching to weapons grade it would have been the opposite of a deterrent. Any president in my lifetime would have attacked them to prevent them from acquiring nuclear weapons.

The fact they were allowed to enrich so much uranium to 60% is embarrassing, we should have attacked in 2021.

Now is it true they lost their entire stockpile? It’s unclear but seems unlikely. Even if it was all buried under rubble all they had to do was dig it out. Most likely damage to their centrifuges was the more important hit, likely setting them back weeks or months.

But it's all conjecture, without confirmation we must assume they are still where they were before the attacks.