d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Iran War Soon?
Prev13334353637146Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 56,269
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 574,605.03
Mar 5 2026 12:41am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0mEWmfbdIE


you cannot reason with unreasonable people.
Member
Posts: 1,562
Joined: Oct 11 2025
Gold: 14,918.00
Mar 5 2026 01:09am
USAs attack was completely unnecessary. But okay, the States are famous for invading everywhere without reason. Nothing new, no surprises.
Member
Posts: 17,267
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 5 2026 01:16am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0mEWmfbdIE


He said "weeks away" one time in that video. That was in 2015, before Iran shipped 98% of it's highly enriched uranium to Russia in compliance with JCPOA(Jan. 2016). He was right. They could have at that point enriched to weapons grade in a matter of weeks. As I explained to sirthom though, if he actually had said "weeks away" in all the years sirthom claimed that "they" did, he would have been incorrect.

You could try American leaders next. You'll find the same thing, their estimations have been consistently realistic. No one has been saying "weeks away" for decades.

The only reason people think their estimations are bullshit is, as I explained in the post you quoted, most people can't understand the difference between creating nuclear weapons and decreasing nuclear latency.

You guys think it's like going on vacation. Lol how could your vacation start in a matter of weeks or months consistently for years if you've still never gone on vacation? You must have been wrong or lying all those times you said it was weeks or months away. This is not how nuclear latency works. You're not understanding what is being discussed.
Member
Posts: 17,267
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 5 2026 01:27am
you cannot reason with unreasonable people.


You can't reason at all apparently. Or read.

Ask your AI how long it would take Iran to enrich uranium from 60% to weapons grade. It is somewhat speculative as I said, and I'm sure the search bot won't explain that. Tack on a couple weeks to it's response and then tell us that number.

Or ignore this, avoid shattering the opinion you formed based on a complete lack of information and knowledge on the subject.
Member
Posts: 18,005
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 5 2026 02:14am
Report:
A U.S. F-15 aircraft crashed in western Iran; the crew members ejected and were rescued by a joint U.S.-Israeli force, reportedly Israel’s Unit 669.

This post was edited by Many_Names on Mar 5 2026 02:14am
Member
Posts: 56,269
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 574,605.03
Mar 5 2026 02:52am
You can't reason at all apparently. Or read.

Ask your AI how long it would take Iran to enrich uranium from 60% to weapons grade. It is somewhat speculative as I said, and I'm sure the search bot won't explain that. Tack on a couple weeks to it's response and then tell us that number.

Or ignore this, avoid shattering the opinion you formed based on a complete lack of information and knowledge on the subject.


all you do is lie and deflect, and ofc, throw petty personal attacks, why anyone should converse with you when you cant concede a point is beyond me. even the Israeli's can concede a point.
Member
Posts: 17,267
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 5 2026 03:20am
all you do is lie and deflect, and ofc, throw petty personal attacks, why anyone should converse with you when you cant concede a point is beyond me. even the Israeli's can concede a point.


You're refusing to concede a point right now. You are guilty of everything you accuse me of.

Remember when you said America gave Saddam Hussein chemical weapons and I laughed and told you that was crazy and then asked you to admit it was a crazy thing to say/believe and you ignored me and started talking about other things? I know you googled it and realized I was right, obviously America was not sending Sarin gas to Iraq lol... so upon being proven wrong, you just pretended it never happened.

If you can give me one example of a time you gave me a similarly incontrovertible fact that proved I was wrong about something and I ignored it, I will concede THIS point.

I can give you several more similar examples if you'd like them.

When our opinions differ this is perfectly understandable. I believe those are the points you want me to concede, you think your opinions are stronger than mine... that's what an opinion is. I believe mine are stronger than yours. We are at an impasse.

The facts are as they are though.

America did not give Saddam Hussein chemical weapons. Iran's nuclear latency has been as short as weeks, months, and years variously at different points in the last 30 years, it is not a one-way climb for the reasons I have explained in detail. These are facts. If you disagree with them, that's not an opinion it's a misconception.

This post was edited by Shadowoffury on Mar 5 2026 03:22am
Member
Posts: 56,269
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 574,605.03
Mar 5 2026 03:21am
You're refusing to concede a point right now. You are guilty of everything you accuse me of.

Remember when you said America gave Saddam Hussein chemical weapons and I laughed and told you that was crazy and then asked you to admit it was a crazy thing to say/believe and you ignored me and started talking about other things? I know you googled it and realized I was right, obviously America was not sending Sarin gas to Iraq lol... so upon being proven wrong, you just pretended it never happened.

If you can give me one example of a time you gave me a similarly incontrovertible fact that proved I was wrong about something and I ignored it, I will concede THIS point.

I can give you several more similar examples if you'd like them.

When our opinions differ this is perfectly understandable. I believe those are the points you want me to concede, you think your opinions are better than mine... that's what an opinion is. The facts are as they are regardless.

America did not give Saddam Hussein chemical weapons. Iran's nuclear latency has been as short as weeks, months, and years variously at different points in the last 30 years, it is not a one-way climb for the reasons I have explained in detail. These are facts. If you disagree with them, that's not an opinion it's a misconception.


LOOK AT YOUR POSTS TODAY. here is an example:

Ok. Who said they were weeks away in 1992? Give me a citation not a generality.

What about 2002?

2009?

2012?

Give me direct quotes, or admit that you are lying and that they spoke in generalities or that they actually said months or years away(which is still very close).

What you’re failing to understand is the difference between creating nuclear weapons and decreasing nuclear latency, which isn’t surprising. It seems like a lot of people in this thread are suffering from the same lack of understanding.

Lol how could they have been two years away in 2012 if they still don’t have them in 2026? This seems like a contradiction if you are ignorant.

Nuclear latency is the time it would take you to create nuclear weapons if you suddenly decided to.

Iran has not been trying to create nuclear weapons(for most of the time) since the 90s, but they have been steadily decreasing their nuclear latency by various means. The purpose of JCPOA, as I have already told you, was to increase their nuclear latency back out to 12 months. It failed. They enriched and stockpiled 60% enriched uranium(at the very least) against the terms of the deal.


There I poked holes in yours, which was not science by the way it was just more dogma.

You are forming opinions without any knowledge whatsoever. Again, this is the behavior of women and children.


Look, we are all having fun here on these forums, we all take what we want from the forums. in here we discuss debate and argue. but its simply no fun talking to you because of how you are carrying on. your position/argument is refuted by facts, facts which you are saying dont exist. so why should i or anyone else bother conversing with you?

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 5 2026 03:23am
Member
Posts: 17,267
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 5 2026 03:24am
LOOK AT YOUR POSTS TODAY. here is an example:



Look, we are all having fun here on these forums, we all take what we want from the forums. in here we discuss debate and argue. but its simply no fun talking to you because of how you are carrying on. your position/argument is refuted by facts, facts which you are saying dont exist. so why should i or anyone else bother conversing with you?


Ok, excellent. You claim my position is refuted by facts. If that is true we can make progress.

Give me the facts.
Member
Posts: 56,269
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 574,605.03
Mar 5 2026 03:31am
Ok, excellent. You claim my position is refuted by facts. If that is true we can make progress.

Give me the facts.


Israeli officials have for decades said that Iran is weeks away from having nukes. true or false? this is not a trick question. at a certain point simple and straight forward dialogue is required for conversation to continue.

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 5 2026 03:32am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13334353637146Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll