Yup, and later tried denying it after people started noticing a bit late. Talmuds been around since forever yet most people never heard about it until a few years ago :wallbash:
You can look up everything I said too. Iran was weeks away from a nuclear bomb in 1992, 2002, 2009, 2012, and just recently again. Try to poke holes in it if you don't believe it. It's science not dogma, if there are holes you can find them and prove them. But there aren't, so you can't.
When the facts do not support your preconceived notions you ignore the facts. This is behavior of women and children.
Ok. Who said they were weeks away in 1992? Give me a citation not a generality.
What about 2002?
2009?
2012?
Give me direct quotes, or admit that you are lying and that they spoke in generalities or that they actually said months or years away(which is still very close).
What you’re failing to understand is the difference between creating nuclear weapons and decreasing nuclear latency, which isn’t surprising. It seems like a lot of people in this thread are suffering from the same lack of understanding.
Lol how could they have been two years away in 2012 if they still don’t have them in 2026? This seems like a contradiction if you are ignorant.
Nuclear latency is the time it would take you to create nuclear weapons if you suddenly decided to.
Iran has not been trying to create nuclear weapons(for most of the time) since the 90s, but they have been steadily decreasing their nuclear latency by various means. The purpose of JCPOA, as I have already told you, was to increase their nuclear latency back out to 12 months. It failed. They enriched and stockpiled 60% enriched uranium(at the very least) against the terms of the deal.
There I poked holes in yours, which was not science by the way it was just more dogma.
You are forming opinions without any knowledge whatsoever. Again, this is the behavior of women and children.