d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Iran War Soon?
Prev11516171819142Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,051
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 25.00
Mar 1 2026 01:05pm
Diplomacy with Israel(including buying the Israeli-made defense systems that shot down most of the Iranian missiles/drones) and hosting American military assets.

They can not attack America and they've already been attacking Israel, the only response possible for them is to attack other American allies in the region. It was a terrible decision which will strain any support they had in the region. But these are the sorts of decisions that regime is defined by, which is why taking them out is the right move.


Exactly.
Member
Posts: 21,967
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Mar 1 2026 01:12pm
Exactly.


You poke a mad dog then point and blame it when it tries to bite you.

no shit Iran is alienating it self in the region.

Everyone else in the region wants to move on into the 21st century.

Iran is the trans issue of the middle east.
Member
Posts: 17,249
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 1 2026 01:17pm
You poke a mad dog then point and blame it when it tries to bite you.

no shit Iran is alienating it self in the region.

Everyone else in the region wants to move on into the 21st century.

Iran is the trans issue of the middle east.


Iran also is literally the trans issue of the middle east lol, Khomeini legalized trans surgery and supported trans rights. It's been a popular destination for Westerners looking to trans for decades.
Member
Posts: 15,051
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 25.00
Mar 1 2026 01:19pm
You poke a mad dog then point and blame it when it tries to bite you.

no shit Iran is alienating it self in the region.

Everyone else in the region wants to move on into the 21st century.

Iran is the trans issue of the middle east.


I’m not sure I understand what you are saying….

The “Trans Issue” has become a more modernized issue while Iran is far from Modern in its way of thinking.

The Trans issue is similar to Iran in the fact it tends to focus on extreme beliefs instead of common sense. One with religious extremism and the other with the continued push for the mutilation and altering of underage children…

I take that back…Iran is very similar to the Trans movement…they both like mutilating the genitals of children…then of course so do Jews and a lot of Christians…

Member
Posts: 21,967
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Mar 1 2026 01:20pm
Iran also is literally the trans issue of the middle east lol, Khomeini legalized trans surgery and supported trans rights. It's been a popular destination for Westerners looking to trans for decades.


that's a very bizzare thing to say.

I'm just saying, What do we do with mad dogs? we put them down.

Because we're intelligent enough to realize it's suffering.
We don't poke it and display it for the local tribes to stare at.

Removing Iran's leaders was the humane thing to do.
Member
Posts: 56,245
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Mar 1 2026 01:23pm
So the CIA tracked Iran's Supreme Leader, gave the details to the Israelis, and it was Israeli bombs that killed him. Netanyahu must be jumping for joy right now. Initial information suggests the strikes have been almost exclusively against military and government sites (which conflicts with the video above), but there are notable exceptions — like the elementary school — which the U.S. and Israel would likely consider collateral damage. The U.S.–Israeli narrative is that they aim to create regime change. Killing the leader does technically achieve a change in leadership, but with little indication of boots on the ground or a full-scale invasion, it’s unclear how they would install a pro-American/Israeli government — bombing tends to strengthen patriotism, even if people dislike their leaders. All indications suggest this campaign is similar to last year’s two-week attack, and available information suggests the U.S.–Israel axis is not in a position to sustain it beyond roughly five days to two weeks. From what I understand, Iran simply does not have the capability to sink a carrier, no matter how many ballistic missiles it has. Therefore, the real question is how Iran responds, noting that prior responses (last year and currently) have been tepid. By “response,” I mean a Western-view “escalatory” response ( or tit-for-tat reaction ).

This is interesting : https://iranstrikemap.com/

Member
Posts: 15,051
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 25.00
Mar 1 2026 01:24pm
that's a very bizzare thing to say.

I'm just saying, What do we do with mad dogs? we put them down.

Because we're intelligent enough to realize it's suffering.
We don't poke it and display it for the local tribes to stare at.

Removing Iran's leaders was the humane thing to do.


This I understand and agree with. I just hope the US is past the whole “We will destroy them and then attempt to spend US tax dollars to build it back up”.

That shit is wack. Let them build themselves back up. You appreciate and are less wreckless with something you had to build with your own two hands.
Member
Posts: 17,975
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 1 2026 01:26pm
The Iranians are using cluster warheads, cluster-type missiles against civilian populations. It’s a miracle they haven’t hit anything last hour

This post was edited by Many_Names on Mar 1 2026 01:27pm
Member
Posts: 15,051
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 25.00
Mar 1 2026 01:29pm
So the CIA tracked Iran's Supreme Leader, gave the details to the Israelis, and it was Israeli bombs that killed him. Netanyahu must be jumping for joy right now. Initial information suggests the strikes have been almost exclusively against military and government sites (which conflicts with the video above), but there are notable exceptions — like the elementary school — which the U.S. and Israel would likely consider collateral damage. The U.S.–Israeli narrative is that they aim to create regime change. Killing the leader does technically achieve a change in leadership, but with little indication of boots on the ground or a full-scale invasion, it’s unclear how they would install a pro-American/Israeli government — bombing tends to strengthen patriotism, even if people dislike their leaders. All indications suggest this campaign is similar to last year’s two-week attack, and available information suggests the U.S.–Israel axis is not in a position to sustain it beyond roughly five days to two weeks. From what I understand, Iran simply does not have the capability to sink a carrier, no matter how many ballistic missiles it has. Therefore, the real question is how Iran responds, noting that prior responses (last year and currently) have been tepid. By “response,” I mean a Western-view “escalatory” response ( or tit-for-tat reaction ).

This is interesting : https://iranstrikemap.com/


They don’t care about making a pro-Israel/US government. That’s all just PR talk. They just want the next Iranian government to be smart enough not to “fuck around and find out”.
Member
Posts: 17,249
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 1 2026 01:38pm
that's a very bizzare thing to say.

I'm just saying, What do we do with mad dogs? we put them down.

Because we're intelligent enough to realize it's suffering.
We don't poke it and display it for the local tribes to stare at.

Removing Iran's leaders was the humane thing to do.


Was just a fun fact.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11516171819142Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll