Excuse #5
Our god won't show up because you will just dismiss him saying "I must be having a hallucination"
im not the one saying that, its testimony from other 'atheists. you dont examine anything anybody offers, "willing ignorant" congrats, your impervious to evidence
0:00
Remember when Richard Dawkins gave
0:02
powerful arguments against the existence
0:04
of God? Neither do I. What sort of
0:06
evidence could God give Dawkins that
0:09
could convince Dawkins to believe in
0:11
God? Well, I used to say it would be
0:13
very simple. It would be a second coming
0:15
of Jesus or or a great big deep booming
0:18
base Paul Robson voice saying, "I am
0:21
God." He used to say that the second
0:23
coming of Jesus or an audible voice from
0:26
God would convince him. But then he
0:28
realized that these things wouldn't
0:30
convince him at all. Even if there was
0:32
this this booming voice and the second
0:34
coming in clouds of glory. The more
0:37
probable explanation is that it's a
0:38
hallucination or conjuring trick by
0:41
David Copperfield or something. Notice
0:44
if God did speak and if Jesus did return
0:47
coming on the clouds of heaven with
0:48
legions of angels, Dawkins
still
0:51
wouldn't believe in God because a more
0:53
probable explanation to him would be
0:55
that it's all a hallucination or a magic
0:57trick. But they're not finished. So if
0:59
you, you know, if you walked out and
1:00
there were these globes that were
1:02
spinning around that said, you know, I
1:03
am God, believe in me, or the famous
1:06
Krauss thing, you walk out into the sky
1:07
and tell spells out in the stars in
1:09
different languages, I am God, believe
1:11
in me. So now we walk outside and we see
1:14
a message written in the stars. The
1:17
stars have been rearranged so that they
1:19
spell out I am God. Believe in me in
1:22
multiple languages. Surely that would
1:25
convince these guys who always go where
1:27
the evidence points, right? any any
1:29
aliens who could actually visit us would
1:31
have to be so far beyond us in their
1:34
technology that they probably could
1:36
manipulate the stars to to um spell out
1:39
words or what would convince him? Well,
1:41
I'm starting to think nothing would.
1:43
Nothing would. Why? Because they've
1:45
adopted a methodology that is completely
1:48
impervious to evidence.This post was edited by TiStuff on Mar 1 2026 03:02am