d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Christianity Is Obviously Fake
Prev1101102103104105274Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 19,152
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
Feb 24 2026 07:54pm
You are avoiding to produce proof trying to derail the conversation into some philosophical sidequest. If a cop stops you on the side of the road you produce the ID no debating. Otherwise you getting tasted for not complying. You were given very specific request with very clear instructions either you have it or not.

You clearly trolling because an honest person would of long ago provided the proof or conceded. Not entertaining this bad mannered behavior.


You are avoiding to produce proof trying to derail the conversation into some philosophical sidequest. If a cop stops you on the side of the road you produce the ID no debating. Otherwise you getting tasted for not complying. You were given very specific request with very clear instructions either you have it or not.

You clearly trolling because an honest person would of long ago provided the proof or conceded. Not entertaining this bad mannered behavior.
Member
Posts: 46,831
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 24 2026 07:56pm
When/where did I say that christians believe in spectacles or magic tricks for personal gain? You are intentionally trying to misconstrue.
I use the word "magic" to mean an umbrella term for supernatural, miracles, special powers etc.

magic
1 of 3
noun
mag·​ic ˈma-jik
Synonyms of magic
1
a
: the use of means (such as charms or spells) believed to have supernatural power over natural forces
b
: magic rites or incantations
2
a
: an extraordinary power or influence seemingly from a supernatural source
Both pitchers, although they are older, haven't lost their magic.
b
: something that seems to cast a spell : enchantment
… all the mystery, magic and romance which belong to royalty alone.
—J. E. P. Grigg
3
: the art of producing illusions by sleight of hand

You saying Peter Pan and Santa not real but jesus is real without proof. If thats all it takes for you to dismiss other magical beings then jesus can be discarded by the same methodology. He is not real and never was. There I proved his non existence in the same manner as you. Checkmate


you using ai? maybe you have ai psychosis? ai is a program and it does what its programed to do. what it seems to do is it feeds the users cognitive bias. basically it agrees with the user. then the user has grand feeling about one self. i imagine the users pride inflates beyond measure

God uses magic
but any other advanced being it would only appear to be magic. (stoppit to funny cant take it anymore :rofl: )

its been pretty much shown that the 'atheist are fine with a creator. they only have fits if that "creator" holds them to moral standards.
Member
Posts: 46,831
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 24 2026 08:18pm
You are avoiding to produce proof trying to derail the conversation into some philosophical sidequest. If a cop stops you on the side of the road you produce the ID no debating. Otherwise you getting tasted for not complying. You were given very specific request with very clear instructions either you have it or not.

You clearly trolling because an honest person would of long ago provided the proof or conceded. Not entertaining this bad mannered behavior.


i think it has already been proved that there is no evidence sufficient enough that could convince someone that doesnt want to believe.

it used to be "evolution" was the greatest proof that the bible was false absolute disproving special creation. o how the 'atheist 'evolutionist would bang on about 'evolving monkeys and "junk genes". dont hear about any of that any more. progression of science has destroyed it all. science is in harmony with scripture. but where is the evidence but where is the evidence? its right up in your face..........

it has been a fantastic thing to observe. 'atheism and the rise and fall of monkey power
..........so much has happened

i suppose thats why addone doesnt have an alterative to scripture. science has destroyed old beliefs?

This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 24 2026 08:19pm
Member
Posts: 16,015
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Feb 24 2026 10:29pm
you using ai? maybe you have ai psychosis? ai is a program and it does what its programed to do. what it seems to do is it feeds the users cognitive bias. basically it agrees with the user. then the user has grand feeling about one self. i imagine the users pride inflates beyond measure

God uses magic
but any other advanced being it would only appear to be magic. (stoppit to funny cant take it anymore :rofl: )

its been pretty much shown that the 'atheist are fine with a creator. they only have fits if that "creator" holds them to moral standards.


It is not ai its called Merriam Webster dictionary. :rofl:
Member
Posts: 46,831
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 25 2026 12:59am
It is not ai its called Merriam Webster dictionary. :rofl:


whats not ai?

there should be an update for logical fallacies.
addone no matter what it is he says "thats not evidence thats not evidence thats not evidence thats not evidence"
we will call it addone ad-nauseum

This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 25 2026 01:05am
Member
Posts: 17,571
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
Feb 25 2026 03:15am
Corals that look like chariot wheels doesn't equate them being actual chariot wheels. Whats next, burnt toast that looks like jesus = actual jesus? This is extremely desperate leap in logic. They were shipwreck debris from ships like the Ulysses or SS Carnatic from 19th century. Major institutions like the Israel Antiquities Authority and peer-reviewed journals have consistently dismissed claims by amateur explorer Ron Wyatt—whose alleged discoveries were based on unverified photos, lack of provenance, and no peer review.
You were deceived you wanted them to be chariot wheels because they just so happened to be around the suspected site of the so called exodus. Happens all the time people who want to see someone really badly often mistaken strangers in the crowd. The mind has powerful imagination whatever you focus on that will grow. A biased mind always finds the bias. A religious person always finds an excuse for god. When someone cured a patient from a horrible desiese = god did it, when asked who put the desiese in the first place then its never gods fault its the person or the environment. Compete manipulation of reality to support an illogical entity.

You provide proof of resurrection i will either dispove it or agree. How do you want me to disprove something that hasn't any proof/legitimacy in the first place?


Then why are those corals the only ones uniquely shaped like the chariot wheels? It's almost like they grew over them.

Funny how you didn't respond to either of these two posts:

https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=107619089&f=119&p=682922789#p682922789
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=107619089&f=119&p=683132051#p683132051

Also you claimed that the shipwreck debris is from either the Ulysses or SS Carnatic? I checked the coordinates of the shipwrecks and compared them to the proximity to the Red Sea crossing and you are actually suggesting that those heavy Chariots would drift all the way to the Gulf of Aqaba and lay to rest there? That would take some kind of magic in itself. You would need to provide...proof how they ended all the way up there. I would seem to think those chariots would simply sink where they submerged near the shipwreck. So based on that your claim of shipwreck debris is greatly flawed.



Without proof magic cannot be called real. Therefore the default = fake
Or fake until proven real.

This thread is simply affirming the default status of religion. Hence christianity = fake

Peter pan, santa claus and any of the magical characters are also in the same default category all fake because magic was never was proven to be real in the first place. If you can prove them real then the fake label will dissappear and I will have to call christianity real or possibly real until then it shall remain fake along with other magical religions. That is the "obvious" part.


I am zooming in on the bold. That is your problem. You would call Christianity real. So what? The demons themselves believe. You never said anything about repenting your sins. That is what God cares much more about. I have said this countless times. The issue is not whether or not God exists. The issue is that you are a sinner, you are rebellious towards God and do not want to accept Jesus as your Lord and Saviour. Why don't we hear more about that from you?
Member
Posts: 16,015
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Feb 26 2026 01:34am
#33 – Who Instigated the Census: God or Satan?
In our journey through differences and contradictions in the Bible, we are driven back to the time of King David and his census.

In 2 Samuel 24:1, it is the Lord who incites David to number Israel, reflecting a theological perspective in which God is sovereign over all events, even those leading to judgment. In contrast, 1 Chronicles 21:1 attributes the incitement to Satan which introduces a distinct shift in theological interpretation.

#34 – Differing Numbers in the Census
The reported results of the census differ significantly between the two accounts. 2 Samuel 24:9 records 800,000 swordsmen in Israel and 500,000 men in Judah, while 1 Chronicles 21:5 lists 1,100,000 swordsmen in Israel and 470,000 in Judah.

#35 – The Death of Saul’s Sons vs. Deuteronomy’s Law
The execution of seven of Saul’s sons (2 Samuel 21:7-14) to atone for his actions contradicts Deuteronomy 24:16, which explicitly states that children shouldn’t be punished for the sins of their fathers. This lex talionis violation suggests a tension between the moral and legal principles outlined in the Torah and the actions described in the narrative.
Member
Posts: 46,831
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 26 2026 01:46am
#33 – Who Instigated the Census: God or Satan?
In our journey through differences and contradictions in the Bible, we are driven back to the time of King David and his census.

In 2 Samuel 24:1, it is the Lord who incites David to number Israel, reflecting a theological perspective in which God is sovereign over all events, even those leading to judgment. In contrast, 1 Chronicles 21:1 attributes the incitement to Satan which introduces a distinct shift in theological interpretation.

#34 – Differing Numbers in the Census
The reported results of the census differ significantly between the two accounts. 2 Samuel 24:9 records 800,000 swordsmen in Israel and 500,000 men in Judah, while 1 Chronicles 21:5 lists 1,100,000 swordsmen in Israel and 470,000 in Judah.

#35 – The Death of Saul’s Sons vs. Deuteronomy’s Law
The execution of seven of Saul’s sons (2 Samuel 21:7-14) to atone for his actions contradicts Deuteronomy 24:16, which explicitly states that children shouldn’t be punished for the sins of their fathers. This lex talionis violation suggests a tension between the moral and legal principles outlined in the Torah and the actions described in the narrative.

how many times have i seen it?
desperately going into obscure old testament straining for a argument

dont get your point in the first one

second one governments have always been inept?

perhaps a good example of the fallen condition of man.

anyway the name of your thread is ? "Christianity Is Obviously Fake" here your biching about judaism

This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 26 2026 01:47am
Member
Posts: 16,015
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Feb 26 2026 01:58am
how many times have i seen it?
desperately going into obscure old testament straining for a argument

dont get your point in the first one

second one governments have always been inept?

perhaps a good example of the fallen condition of man.

anyway the name of your thread is ? "Christianity Is Obviously Fake" here your biching about judaism


Bible = Judaism? Good to know

Also you are calling your god inept because he cant count very well.
Member
Posts: 16,015
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Feb 26 2026 02:01am
#36 – The Number of Saul’s Sons
Another example of the contradiction in the Bible arises concerning the number of Saul’s sons. In 1 Samuel 31:2 and 1 Chronicles 10:5, Saul and all his sons are said to have died in battle, yet 2 Samuel 21:1-14 introduces seven additional sons whose deaths are required to atone for Saul’s sin.

#37 – Michal or Merab?
In 2 Samuel 21:8, the text states that five of the executed sons were Michal’s. However, this conflicts with 2 Samuel 6:23, which explicitly states that Michal, David’s wife, had no children.

Scholars argue this is likely a scribal error and that the text should read “Merab” (Michal’s sister) instead of Michal. This correction aligns with 1 Samuel 18:17, where Merab is mentioned as Saul’s daughter.

#38 – Did Saul See Samuel Again After His Rejection?
An apparent biblical contradiction is also seen in 1 Samuel 15:35. There, it’s explicitly stated that after Saul was rejected by God: “Samuel did not see Saul again until the day of his death.” The Hebrew word used (ra’a), clearly indicates physical sight or meeting.

However, in 1 Samuel 19:24, Saul encounters Samuel during an episode in which Saul is overcome by the Spirit of God and prophesies in Samuel’s presence at Naioth in Ramah.



This post was edited by addone on Feb 26 2026 02:01am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1101102103104105274Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll