:rofl: Christianity makes magic claims for the unknown, ofc you would say that about Christianity any monkey can do that. (Thats why there were thousands of religions/gods invented). The hard part is to provide proof for those magical claims which you have been avoiding like a coward..
This is why threads like these exist to check your cult from spreading unsubstantiated claims. Do not pass go, do not collect $200 provide proof now or gtfo. Thanks.
as we have previously established you don't actually care about proof or justification when you said "Does it matter what the justification is? We got self determination, creativity and ability to do as we please. Why are you trying to fill in the gaps of our knowledge with this magical being called god? I don't get the obsession."
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=107619089&f=119&p=682540199the proof is in the form of any proof, philosophical argumentation. to ask for empirical evidence you must first have epistemic justification for empiricism, which you cannot account for but the Christian worldview perfectly accounts for. You borrow from the Christian worldview in an attempt to argue against it, the Christian worldview is the only worldview that can perfectly account for the possibility of knowledge and transcendental categories, the problem of the one and the many etc. You just laughing and not understanding how basic epistemology works and calling philosophy "magic" isn't an argument. to say something is "unknown" requires the possibility of knowledge which you have still not justified. I have previously pointed out that you suffer from the myth of neutrality, this is simply a fallacy. You think you are on neutral ground and others must "prove" Christianity to you, but it is actually the case that the possibility of knowledge itself requires the Christian worldview to be true and your worldview cannot account for the possibility of knowledge.
the positive case is crystalized in
x is the necessary precondition for y, y therefore x.
God is the necessary precondition for transcendentals, transcendentals exist therefore God exists.
since you are currently using Y to argue with me, you are implicitly proving X.
the negative case for any other worldview is the impossibility of the contrary which can be shown in further argumentation, which is why I ask for your worldview and justification or your worldview, to show how it makes the possibility of knowledge impossible.
this is how arguments work, how proof works, the methodology how we understand the world and instead of attempting to proceed your usual reply is posting facebook memes.