Power is subjective

No, it's not...

Yeah it is. You can have power and not be powerful. You can have "powers" and not be powerful.

Tf yall really on about?

That's not being subjective, that's the same word having different meanings.

This thread isn't asking about power, it asking about powers, as in superpowers. Ironman and Batman are powerful, but they don't have powers.

Power isn't solely subjective, but the way it is experienced and exerted can often depend on individual perspectives and contexts.

Subjective Power: This refers to an individual's perception or experience of power. For instance, someone might feel powerful because they have control over their environment or the people around them, even if, from an outside perspective, they don't hold any formal position of power. This kind of power is often tied to psychological factors, such as confidence, influence, or belief in one's own agency.

Objective Power: This refers to power in more tangible terms—like authority, resources, or structural advantages. For example, a political leader, a wealthy person, or a corporation may possess power through their control over institutions, money, or the means of production. This type of power is measurable in concrete ways, often shaped by external systems, laws, and hierarchies.

Not reading that essay, ese'

Is that what you always say when proven wrong?

Proven.. lol. Show me the science, kid

the true actual power of ... nah id rather not

It's right there for ya to read, lol.