Again, I agree that all links to Epstein should be fully investigated. What I don't agree with is what you guys have been doing, acting like the evidence against your political adversaries is already in our hands and anyone who doesn't believe that is stupid. The evidence is not there.
If you want to demand more transparency, I'm on your side. If you're just going to keep lying, obviously I am not on your side.
This post is a common misunderstanding of the difference between evidence and proof. there is evidence, that's what justifies an investigation. you cant say you want an investigation but there is no evidence, because that's against our constitution. we only investigate things that we have evidence showing there is potential wrongdoing.
what we dont have is proof. on that we agree. and ive never claimed anything to the contrary. im not in the gnarjay camp of saying trump IS a proven pedophile, or rapist, or even calling him a felon. Trump isn't my political adversary, im not a democrat.
but that puts us in a feedback loop. evidence exists, so an investigation should be done, those in charge of the investigation are implicated in the evidence, so the investigation wont happen or will be tainted by bias. and around and around we go. we're stuck in this loop and wont break out.