dude is literally triggered by a word. the maps isnt inaccurate, it just "suggests something".
because he's been bred from a young age to believe that its only bad to take land from people if they're a sovereign nation, not living in a mandated territory. people in a mandate are just at the whims of their sovereign overlords and can be expelled morally to zionists.
the ironic thing is this is exactly what happened to jews after their exile from Israel for a few thousand years, and its something that they cry about (rightfully) all of the time. but when they do it its ok because god promised the land to them. or worse because like him they're middle eastern jews and its payback for how they were treated before 1948.
Jews did not receive the land because it was a “mandated territory people could be expelled from.” The legal and political framework was the internationally recognized Balfour Declaration and later the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine, which explicitly called for the establishment of a Jewish national home while also protecting the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities.
you ignore the fact that:
Jews were already a continuous population in the land for centuries before 1948, and Jewish immigration and land purchases during the Mandate period were largely legal transactions under the governing authority of the time.
The conflict did not emerge from some abstract belief about mandates but from competing national movements in the same territory after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, which is a far more complex historical reality than your characterization.
Also, the claim that Zionism was simply about “God promised the land” is historically inaccurate. Early political Zionism, led by figures like Theodor Herzl, was largely secular and based on national self determination, not religious entitlement