Epstein WAS prosecuted AND charged; Ghislaine maxwell was prosecuted AND charged
If there was already enough evidence to prosecute Epstein and Maxwell, then why hasn’t there been full transparency about all associated records, co-conspirators, and investigative findings? The DOJ had custody of Epstein under the Trump administration, and the circumstances of his death remain deeply controversial. That lack of clarity fuels suspicion. why is trump covering for Leon Black, Les Wexner, Sultan Bin Sulayem, Ehud Barak , et al?
The Justice Department has not explained why redactions have been made in such a confused and inconsistent way, nor have they addressed why other individuals beyond Epstein were never charged, except to say there was no evidence that would allow them to prosecute anyone else which WE KNOW IS A FUCKING LIE!
not only are you too lazy to read, youre too lazy to think for your own self.
I agree with most of this. Obviously Epstein and Maxwell were prosecuted, there was plenty of evidence against both of them.
We were not talking about them when you said we already have enough to prosecute them, we were talking about “everyone listed in the Epstein files” there is not enough evidence to prosecute those people, as I have said repeatedly. Maybe it exists and is being covered up, but you said it’s available, linked me to the public Epstein files and then posted some of their contents which, again, do not contain enough evidence to prosecute.
I agree with you that all of that stuff is controversial and suspicious, but controversy and suspicion are not evidence.
We do not, in fact, know that it is a lie. It seems very likely to me that it is a lie, but that’s not the same as verifiable evidence.
I finished the book I was reading today, and made progress on another. I’m far from too lazy to read, I spend time at it every single day. I am not too lazy to think for myself either, unlike you I’m just not dumb enough to believe my unconfirmed suspicions constitute objective fact.