Based on the legal system we are talking about… an accusation may be enough to start an investigation(which in this case may require information from Maxwell to “fill in the gaps”), it is not enough to prosecute.
You said there is already enough evidence to prosecute. Again, where is it?
Epstein WAS prosecuted AND charged; Ghislaine maxwell was prosecuted AND charged
If there was already enough evidence to prosecute Epstein and Maxwell, then why hasn’t there been full transparency about all associated records, co-conspirators, and investigative findings? The DOJ had custody of Epstein under the Trump administration, and the circumstances of his death remain deeply controversial. That lack of clarity fuels suspicion. why is trump covering for Leon Black, Les Wexner, Sultan Bin Sulayem, Ehud Barak , et al?
The Justice Department has not explained why redactions have been made in such a confused and inconsistent way, nor have they addressed why other individuals beyond Epstein were never charged, except to say there was no evidence that would allow them to prosecute anyone else which WE KNOW IS A FUCKING LIE!
not only are you too lazy to read, youre too lazy to think for your own self.
This post was edited by gnarjay on Feb 17 2026 06:16pm