d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Epstein
Prev1107108109110111127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Feb 17 2026 04:19pm
your assertion that 'gaps need to be filled' is based on what?

what evidence do you have that proves there are gaps needing to be filled?


your post here:

makes no sense.


I’ve read everything you posted. Again, these are accusations. There is not enough evidence in there to prosecute, for example, Donald Trump. If you want to prosecute him, there are gaps that need to be filled. There is evidence that needs to be found.

If you have that evidence, as you claimed to, then show me that.
Member
Posts: 19,212
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Feb 17 2026 05:23pm
There is not enough evidence in there to prosecute, for example, Donald Trump. If you want to prosecute him, there are gaps that need to be filled. There is evidence that needs to be found.


based on what, your opinion? need more than that buddy

This post was edited by gnarjay on Feb 17 2026 05:23pm
Member
Posts: 19,212
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Feb 17 2026 05:24pm
Member
Posts: 19,212
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Feb 17 2026 05:25pm
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Feb 17 2026 06:05pm
based on what, your opinion? need more than that buddy


Based on the legal system we are talking about… an accusation may be enough to start an investigation(which in this case may require information from Maxwell to “fill in the gaps”), it is not enough to prosecute.

You said there is already enough evidence to prosecute. Again, where is it?

This post was edited by Shadowoffury on Feb 17 2026 06:07pm
Member
Posts: 19,212
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Feb 17 2026 06:14pm
Based on the legal system we are talking about… an accusation may be enough to start an investigation(which in this case may require information from Maxwell to “fill in the gaps”), it is not enough to prosecute.

You said there is already enough evidence to prosecute. Again, where is it?


Epstein WAS prosecuted AND charged; Ghislaine maxwell was prosecuted AND charged

If there was already enough evidence to prosecute Epstein and Maxwell, then why hasn’t there been full transparency about all associated records, co-conspirators, and investigative findings? The DOJ had custody of Epstein under the Trump administration, and the circumstances of his death remain deeply controversial. That lack of clarity fuels suspicion. why is trump covering for Leon Black, Les Wexner, Sultan Bin Sulayem, Ehud Barak , et al?


The Justice Department has not explained why redactions have been made in such a confused and inconsistent way, nor have they addressed why other individuals beyond Epstein were never charged, except to say there was no evidence that would allow them to prosecute anyone else which WE KNOW IS A FUCKING LIE!


not only are you too lazy to read, youre too lazy to think for your own self.

This post was edited by gnarjay on Feb 17 2026 06:16pm
Member
Posts: 46,807
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 17 2026 07:38pm
Epstein WAS prosecuted AND charged; Ghislaine maxwell was prosecuted AND charged

If there was already enough evidence to prosecute Epstein and Maxwell, then why hasn’t there been full transparency about all associated records, co-conspirators, and investigative findings? The DOJ had custody of Epstein under the Trump administration, and the circumstances of his death remain deeply controversial. That lack of clarity fuels suspicion. why is trump covering for Leon Black, Les Wexner, Sultan Bin Sulayem, Ehud Barak , et al?


The Justice Department has not explained why redactions have been made in such a confused and inconsistent way, nor have they addressed why other individuals beyond Epstein were never charged, except to say there was no evidence that would allow them to prosecute anyone else which WE KNOW IS A FUCKING LIE!


not only are you too lazy to read, youre too lazy to think for your own self.


wow dude you read this stuff your writing. before elon said trump was in the epstein files you never wrote anything like that. lol you sound like a "cOnSpIRaREEE tHorIsT"
i think its fantastic you asking all these kinds of questions. :)

(im going to get some time later and break down your letter and why its meaningless)

This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 17 2026 07:39pm
Member
Posts: 19,212
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Feb 17 2026 07:59pm
wow dude you read this stuff your writing. before elon said trump was in the epstein files you never wrote anything like that. lol you sound like a "cOnSpIRaREEE tHorIsT"
i think its fantastic you asking all these kinds of questions. :)

(im going to get some time later and break down your letter and why its meaningless)


no need to respond, i already know its going to be bitchute psychobabble nonsense. say a prayer instead :)
Member
Posts: 46,807
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 17 2026 08:01pm
no need to respond, i already know its going to be bitchute psychobabble nonsense. say a prayer instead :)


what a cOnSpIrAREEE tHorRiSt would say :)
Member
Posts: 19,212
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Feb 17 2026 08:07pm
what a cOnSpIrAREEE tHorRiSt would say :)


you cannot engage in actual conversation. believe me, i tried !
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1107108109110111127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll