why would I backtrack from telling the truth? because it doesn't appease to your emotions? I don't care about that at all.

do you have anything to add other than emotional responses or bitching/tone policing? do you have an argument? do you have an ounce of testosterone?

It took Moses 40 years to make a 6 day walking trip let that sink in

Pain requires a functioning brain and a central nervous system which are voided upon death. Therefore hell cannot produce suffering or pain or any kind rendering the entire concept completely pointless. Essentially hell is empty threat for guillable adults who never paused for 10 sec and think critically what they are being told.

Whats it like being conned to believe in such bedtime stories?

This post was edited by addone on Jan 30 2026 03:48pm

Why did it take Moses 40 years? Simply free will disobedience, not God's fault. That's truth, but I'm curious, what's your theory aside from the truth?

Notice how you ignored my response to you and quoted a response to someone else.



Edit: I'm also backtracking trying to find when you brought that up to me. Can you link me when you made this comment to me? I can't find it.




He said he believes in an advanced civilization that he is unable to prove. He puts his faith in an idea that holds no real mathematical or logical reasoning behind it. He's able to put his faith in something empty and full of nothing in order for him to live in his sin guilt free ignoring the heart problem he knows he has and puts on the back burner.

That's about all we could get out of him so far.

This post was edited by D_urRRR on Jan 30 2026 04:39pm

Another great point. Dont ever have any emotions. Be a vacant empty husk for jesus.

Still doing great.





Which is why I said it silenced not only you but everyone else. Which is what its doing now.

This post was edited by Sh00p on Jan 30 2026 04:55pm

You realize you said that to E1ite and not me right? It's no wonder I didn't see it from the lack of notification I experienced.

Your comment is like saying we didn't find king arthurs sword so courage must not exist.

Exodus was intended to teach who God is and not to be used as a modern history textbook. Archaeology has not disproved God and it has not even disproved that something like Exodus happened. The God doesn’t exist conclusion is a philosophical add-on, not a scientific one. Exodus teaches that freedom is sacred, power is accountable, suffering matters, and faith is a relationship that reshapes how a people live and not just what they believe.

Again, many of you have a lack of understanding of the bibles contents, its context, and the whole point of God's teachings.

Morality doesnt prove a god. You can get these teachings from any book from even modern authors. Jumping from this to "Know what there has to be a single ominpotent being that made everything but he wont do anything nowadays because reasons." is what has a lot of people so miffed.

If the bible was just presented as a book of the teachings and how you should learn how to behave and not all this other fantastical bullshit about a god that clearly isnt there and doesnt give a shit, I think a lot of "atheists" would be just fine with it. Nobody would be out there trying to prove or disprove anything. But no, we gatta have all this shit.

you're not making an argument, this is the point.

Many people including yourself struggle with the fact they need God in a physical form of evidence and ironically you have it everywhere around you.

You don't act this way with any other religion, only Christianity. Why do you only struggle with this with Jesus?

Our world points to intentional design and you refuse to understand that the soul you have free will over was created with a purpose. The way you are currently living is not what God intended. You are clearly dealing with a lot of trauma and I'd love to know why you blame God for it.

This post was edited by D_urRRR on Jan 30 2026 05:24pm

objective morality does necessarily require God. a book itself isn't the origin of morality, just because another book can repeat the same truth doesn't mean morality itself is justified in a particular book. morality is grounded in the being of God.

your worldview murder = "i don't like murder", it's a preference


the argument is as follows:

A is the necessary precondition for B

B, therefore A

God is the necessary precondition for immaterial transcendental categories

immaterial transcendental categories exists, therefore God exists.

if you disagree, what is your epistemic justification for truth, reason, meaning, purpose, objective morality, induction and universals in your worldview? I don't mean "you can't do a particular moral action unless you personally believe in God". Use is not a justification, I am asking how in your materialistic worldview where there is no God how do you know these things exist and what is your justification for their existence?