Do you mean the scene where 3 people tried to murder him?

do you mean the scene where he open carried an AR-15 which was ok?

Yes, that scene. Seems like clear cut self-defense which has nothing to do with the case here then.

but I thought the reason the deceased here was shot in the first place was because they were carrying a gun?

This is what it looked like when Kyle Rittenhouse reached the authorities as opposed to the lynch mob trying to murder him;



Do people really need explained the basic concept of self-defense and the reasonable perception of a deadly threat justifying lethal response?
Because quite frankly, every argument I read online about this is moronic. To the point, I wonder if people who argue these topics can tie their own shoes or have a meal of soup without a dribble mat
So I'm expecting some more of those trenchant insights as opposed to superficial nonsense about crossing state lines or whatever

now show the picture or video clearly demonstrating where the deceased was a deadly threat justifying lethal response. you've established that merely carrying a gun is not sufficient for such action.

/e censored for pard now that I look a bit closer it was graphic

This post was edited by Goomshill on Jan 26 2026 04:27pm

i wanna see

Good Posts

We were told immediately what the media said were the facts of the case when its being investigated and no information has come out on it yet, its all assumptions and nonsense.

This post was edited by darkhead69 on Jan 26 2026 04:47pm

"B-but I just wanna argue in bad faith!"

Go all out, champ.