Today I am going to wake up and go agitate armed agents while I wear a gun. Unfortunately the guy probably had mental problems and/or was hypnotized by MSM.

I consider myself centrist, as a registered independent my view is, too much of anything is a bad thing, to far left, to far right. Both are bad. But what I have a really hard time understanding is, why are people mad that illegals are being removed from the country? I'm looking at a social media post that covers some illegals detained in the state of Maine. It shows mugshots and lists their crimes. Each crime listed (singular charge on each person). Aggravated Assault with a weapon, Selling Amphetamine, 3. Selling Cocaine, Burglary - Forced Entry of Residence, Selling Amphetamine, Assault, Selling Cocaine, Aggravated Assault, Selling Heroin, Larceny, Failure to Report crime, Aggravated Assault on a family member, Selling Cocaine. Each one of these individuals are in the United States illegally.

I don't want to live next to these people! Has the left gone way too far to defend these people? I figured we want these people out and could agree on that. What is the logic?????

leftie street terrorists are known documented murderers. some one possibly said "gun" when they grabbed it. another only heard gun and plugged him.

I mean yeah I wouldn't go to protest with a firearm but from what I've been told by every 2A enthusiast on here that's the entier point of 2A and from what I see he didn't draw the firearm at all and authority still executed him for having a firearm which is legal there.

So I'd assume all the 2A supporters will be out in force with the Karen's in this case.

With the benefit of multiple angles of videos and slowed down and zoomed in analysis we can't see what he's doing with his hands. Makes you wonder what the agents at the scene saw or thought they saw.

Minnesota already set an explicit precedent a few years ago that if you bring a firearm to a potentially violent protest/rally/riot you've forfeited your right to self-defense and are responsible for the outcomes even if a gang of violent rioters chase you for multiple blocks trying to beat you to death
And in that case one of the jurors told reporters afterwords the guy thought he was going to be another George Zimmerman but this is Minnesota and she was proud for her own little measure of 'justice for trayvon', even if it was an unrelated case.

Is there SCOTUS precedence to that?


The 2A also has a different interpretation of the 'free state' per the majority opinion of the Lion of DC vs Heller. Why militia* and 2A aren't explicitly beholden to government. Lefties Learing about it

This post was edited by RedFromWinter on Jan 24 2026 03:15pm

Rioting has still been going on and is underway
In the past few hours-

Tear gas deployed everywhere, rioters attempting to put up barricades, national guard activated, dispersal orders and unlawful assembly declared, rioters burning furniture and mattresses and clouding the area with smoke
One federal officer lost a finger that was bitten off by a rioter
A three year old child was struck by a tear gas canister and suffered a head wound


This seems to me an appropriate point for the state national guard to be activated and restore order, feds should only be a resort if the state fails to calm the situation