d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine 2025+
Prev1107108109110111129Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 21 2026 02:43pm
Well-deserved and life-preserving.

The US did not design a missile detection system that could mistake birds for nuclear weapons, Russia did that and their stupidity is the closest the world has ever come to total destruction.


The US designed a missile detection system and placed it in Eastern Europe that led to the new arms race, breaking existing nuclear arms treaties.

Well done!
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jan 21 2026 02:47pm
The US designed a missile detection system and placed it in Eastern Europe that led to the new arms race, breaking existing nuclear arms treaties.

Well done!


Well at least we agree on that, it was a wise decision.
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 21 2026 03:09pm
Well at least we agree on that, it was a wise decision.


NATO doing NATO things

It led to a new generation hypersonic missiles NATO cannot defend against
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jan 21 2026 03:19pm
NATO doing NATO things

It led to a new generation hypersonic missiles NATO cannot defend against


If you believe that I got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 21 2026 03:38pm
If you believe that I got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.


The math speaks for itself

I'm a realist you're an ideologist

@50:00 can you intercept an oreshnik missile

Member
Posts: 56,241
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Jan 21 2026 03:59pm
Well-deserved and life-preserving.

The US did not design a missile detection system that could mistake birds for nuclear weapons, Russia did that and their stupidity is the closest the world has ever come to total destruction.


1979 Norad Alarm?

your welcome.
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jan 21 2026 04:22pm
1979 Norad Alarm?

your welcome.


That wasn’t a design flaw in the system, it was a training tape being put in by accident. But actually the response to the 1979 norad alarm goes a long way into proving my point that the USSR did not take their responsibility seriously enough.

The American incident involved a telephone conversation between a colonel and the National Security Advisor trying to decide whether or not to wake the president of the united states to have him make a decision. They did not wake the president. Why? Because there were redundancies, other detection systems which were not reporting the same thing.

The Russian incident involved a lieutenant colonel who concluded that it was unlikely to be an American attack, and did not report it. He said that every single one of his fellow duty officers would have reported it as a certain nuclear attack. And there were no redundancies.
Member
Posts: 15,999
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 21 2026 05:23pm
The part you conveniently didn't mention is that Ukraine's nuclear arsenal was aimed at Western cities. They were part of the USSR, they were the commies

Just saying


Operative word "were". They were sold on this utopia and surprise surprise it didn't work out. Afterwards they didn't want anything to do with communism. You are talking about pre 1991 Ukraine which was really taking orders on behalf of Russians.

After their independence they made it abundantly clear they wanted nothing to do with Russia and join nato and be allies with the west.

Ukraine actually was paid for turning over their weapons, as part of a side deal they negotiated secretly because Kazakhstan and Belarus were not paid.

Your comment on Cuba is wrong also. Russia was the threat at the time, which is why they were doing it, but the result would have been the same if someone else tried the same thing. If France moved weapons into Cuba it would be interpreted as an act of war against the United States too. It doesn't matter who does it, if anyone tries to move into the western hemisphere America has a policy of considering that a direct threat. This same policy secured Canada's ability to help Britain during WW1 with no fear of domestic attacks even before America entered the war. An attack on Canada would have been considered an attack on America even before NATO, even a legitimate attack during a world war wherein Canada was a belligerent aiding in attacks on other countries. It doesn't matter, they're not allowed to bring any of their European bullshit over here.

Russia wishes they could enforce a similar policy, their only chance is on a much smaller scale(Ukraine). NATO was moving weapons into Ukraine whose only purpose was to kill Russians, they interpreted that as a threat because it was a threat.


Well you might be right they didn't entirely get nothing, but they were paid cents on a dollar for the large amount of uranium. Still incredibly poor deal. Like going on an episode of pawn stars and Rick offered you $10 and 1/2 a slice of pizza for your Rolex.

United States has the most military bases on the planet by a large margin, it sets up on other people's backyards then cries when other contries do the same. Its pure cope
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jan 21 2026 05:31pm
Operative word "were". They were sold on this utopia and surprise surprise it didn't work out. Afterwards they didn't want anything to do with communism. You are talking about pre 1991 Ukraine which was really taking orders on behalf of Russians.

After their independence they made it abundantly clear they wanted nothing to do with Russia and join nato and be allies with the west.



Well you might be right they didn't entirely get nothing, but they were paid cents on a dollar for the large amount of uranium. Still incredibly poor deal. Like going on an episode of pawn stars and Rick offered you $10 and 1/2 a slice of pizza for your Rolex.

United States has the most military bases on the planet by a large margin, it sets up on other people's backyards then cries when other contries do the same. Its pure cope


What you call “cope” is actually called “military supremacy”.

I agree in this case though, we should have left Ukraine alone. We should leave them alone right now, let the corrupt shitholes fight it out amongst themselves. We aren’t helping anyone.
Member
Posts: 15,999
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 21 2026 05:58pm
What you call “cope” is actually called “military supremacy”.

I agree in this case though, we should have left Ukraine alone. We should leave them alone right now, let the corrupt shitholes fight it out amongst themselves. We aren’t helping anyone.


You got those euphemisms down to a t comrade. Well we are enjoying the power generated from the uranium from those very same warheads we put pressure on Ukraine to disband. So we do owe them something. Otherwise Ukraine wouldn't need us right now and we wouldn't be enjoying all this power.

Besides Russia is always a threat and if we abandon our allies our enemies will grow stronger. Just look at how the leftist virus has infected the minds of so many Americans. If we dont deal with this now soon little Gambol won't be able to get a nickel for his grandma.

This post was edited by addone on Jan 21 2026 05:59pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1107108109110111129Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll