d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Minneapolis Ice Capades 2026
Prev13738394041120Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 46,788
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jan 14 2026 10:38am
leftie frauds get away with ramming people with their car you will be next
Member
Posts: 50,655
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,866.00
Jan 14 2026 01:43pm
Bro shot two people and couldn't kill either of them what a fucking skill issue.


Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 14 2026 03:07pm
So the officer suffered internal bleeding to the torso after the incident according to medical records.

Yet, leftoids still claim that Renee Good didn't hit him with the car, despite there being video evidence from multiple angles

Fully Orwellian. They deny reality
Member
Posts: 50,655
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,866.00
Jan 14 2026 03:19pm
So the officer suffered internal bleeding to the torso after the incident according to medical records.
Yet, leftoids still claim that Renee Good didn't hit him with the car, despite there being video evidence from multiple angles
Fully Orwellian. They deny reality


It sounds to me like they're playing up his injury like he took a fall in soccer, purely for optics and narrative. His injury is totally irrelevant to his legal justification to use force in an apolitical, unbiased legal and ethical lens. Its also necessary for survival against the modern internet fueled lynch mob. Most likely he had some bruising which is by definition internal bleeding, the rupturing of petechiae. His decision to shoot was based on seeing the erratic and already aggressive driver ignore commands, dangerously back up into people, ignoring people at her doors and windows as she put it in drive and lurched forwards towards him. No subsequent events can retroactively affect his justification at that point. If she had completely missed him, it shouldn't matter
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 14 2026 03:31pm
It sounds to me like they're playing up his injury like he took a fall in soccer, purely for optics and narrative. His injury is totally irrelevant to his legal justification to use force in an apolitical, unbiased legal and ethical lens. Its also necessary for survival against the modern internet fueled lynch mob. Most likely he had some bruising which is by definition internal bleeding, the rupturing of petechiae. His decision to shoot was based on seeing the erratic and already aggressive driver ignore commands, dangerously back up into people, ignoring people at her doors and windows as she put it in drive and lurched forwards towards him. No subsequent events can retroactively affect his justification at that point. If she had completely missed him, it shouldn't matter


You are completely right that it doesn't/shouldn't matter in the principle of self defence in which he is clearly justified, but we should be careful not to cede the argument that he was actually hit by the car, which he was, and not just driven at and missed/he dodged it, as at the end of the day what people believe is what matters.

Something else that is important which people should understand is that the officer was a federal agent, not police. Police have a duty to build rapport and trust in the communities they serve, which often means not shooting in a situation like this, but federal agents are under no such obligation as they are not part of the community. Many people here have been holding the officer to police standards when he was not police but a federal agent.
Member
Posts: 50,655
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,866.00
Jan 14 2026 04:11pm
You are completely right that it doesn't/shouldn't matter in the principle of self defence in which he is clearly justified, but we should be careful not to cede the argument that he was actually hit by the car, which he was, and not just driven at and missed/he dodged it, as at the end of the day what people believe is what matters.
Something else that is important which people should understand is that the officer was a federal agent, not police. Police have a duty to build rapport and trust in the communities they serve, which often means not shooting in a situation like this, but federal agents are under no such obligation as they are not part of the community. Many people here have been holding the officer to police standards when he was not police but a federal agent.


From a civil liberties perspective it shouldn't matter whether he's a state or federal agent when it comes to his own personal criminal liability. The laws should be in sync, only one jurisdiction should apply, and it shouldn't matter what reaction people have to it. That's a whole bunch of 'shoulds'.
If he was a state officer he'd be facing life in prison and the state would be paying $30 million to the wife. Even as a federal agent and with federal immunity the state might still try to 'Chauvin him.

Too often the difference between state and federal law isn't a separation of jurisdictions under the 10th amendment, but fucked up state governments driven by ultra radical fringes in their ideologically pure enclaves being tempered by the federal consensus government trying to smack some sense into them
Member
Posts: 49,886
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jan 14 2026 06:04pm
So the officer suffered internal bleeding to the torso after the incident according to medical records.

Yet, leftoids still claim that Renee Good didn't hit him with the car, despite there being video evidence from multiple angles

Fully Orwellian. They deny reality


Under their definition a bruise is internal bleeding..
Member
Posts: 46,788
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jan 14 2026 06:15pm
So the officer suffered internal bleeding to the torso after the incident according to medical records.

Yet, leftoids still claim that Renee Good didn't hit him with the car, despite there being video evidence from multiple angles

Fully Orwellian. They deny reality


if fraud lefties are saying the cop wasnt run into maybe i need to update my leftie fraud liar list?
Member
Posts: 4,061
Joined: May 24 2008
Gold: 719.75
Jan 14 2026 06:19pm
Under their definition a bruise is internal bleeding..


The point was the she definitely hit him with her car. Seen lots of people pushing the idea that she didn’t touch him at all, among other fabrications.
Member
Posts: 49,886
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jan 14 2026 06:48pm
The point was the she definitely hit him with her car. Seen lots of people pushing the idea that she didn’t touch him at all, among other fabrications.


You can get bruises anywhere, it may have been pre existing.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13738394041120Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll