d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Christianity Is Obviously Fake
123267Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,995
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 9 2026 01:42pm
It is obviously a made up story from collections of writings with many unknown unverified authors. Translated and curated by several councils of men who decided what is to be included or excluded. Mainly so it's more palatable for an average pleb in order to control them.

If you step back and look at it as a whole it is nothing more then a bedtime story for adults to behave in a certain manner. It is one of many (thousands) of religions. Just about everyone on the planet had mythological story of some kind that they shared around the campfire. Everyone thinks theirs is the best and the one true religion, just like hardcore sports fans cheer for their home team.
As an outsider who isn't affiliated with any of these archaic dogmas it is obvious that none of them are the best or real. Observing here people in pard you will notice there is a distinct tribal conflict between left vs right.

The purpose of this thread is to explore the contradictions, make light of the magical story and to hopefully bring awareness to the religious fans who seem to be under the spell that their invisible dad is real.

Lets begin!
Member
Posts: 15,995
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 9 2026 01:45pm
Lets start with a few basic contradictions. I know some of you have been itching for me to come back and prove me wrong well here is your chance. Lets keep it civil and try to answer each other truthfully without devolving into kindergarten.


#1 - The Earth Does Not Last Forever
In Ecclesiastes 1:4, we read that “the earth remains forever,” a sentiment echoed in Psalm 104:5, which praises God for laying the foundations of the earth so firmly that “it should never be moved.”

However, this view contrasts sharply with certain passages in the New Testament that foresee the destruction of the current earth and the creation of a new one. For example, 2 Peter 3:13 describes the hope for “new heavens and a new earth, where righteousness dwells,” and Revelation 21:1 envisions “a new heaven and a new earth” after the first has passed away.

#2 - The Number of Animals Noah Took on the Ark
Another example that reminds us of the discrepancies in the Bible can be found in the story of Noah and the Ark. In Genesis 6:19-20, God commands Noah to take two of every kind of animal — one male and one female — onto the Ark to preserve their species. However, in Genesis 7:2-3, the instructions are more specific, stating that Noah should take seven pairs of clean animals (suitable for sacrifice) and one pair of unclean animals.

So, which is it? This discrepancy reflects differing traditions within the text, likely stemming from the merging of multiple sources behind the composition of Genesis. As Robert Alter explains in his Commentary:

As scholarship has often noted, two versions of the Flood story, the Priestly and the Yahwistic, are intertwined in a somewhat confusing fashion... Abraham ibn Ezra and other medieval exegetes rescue consistency by proposing that when God directed attention to the clean-unclean distinction, He had to add the difference in numbers because more animals needed to be sacrificed. (Noah, like his counterpart in the Mesopotamian Flood stories, does in fact offer a thanksgiving sacrifice after the waters recede.) But the tensions between the two versions, including how they record the time span of the Flood, persist, and there are some indications that the editor himself struggled to harmonize them.


#3 - Two Creation Stories
In exploring other biblical contradictions, we are (for now) staying with the Book of Genesis, which begins with two distinct accounts of creation. In Genesis 1:1-2:3, it unfolds in a structured, ordered sequence over six days, culminating in the creation of humanity (male and female) together on the sixth day.

In Genesis 2:4-25, however, the narrative is more focused on human formation. Here, man (Adam) is created first from the dust of the ground, followed by vegetation, animals, and finally, a woman (Eve) as a helper. This portrayal is more intimate and anthropocentric, with God personally shaping Adam and breathing life into him.
Member
Posts: 8,306
Joined: Oct 16 2006
Gold: 57.00
Jan 9 2026 01:47pm
“ChatGPT can you make me a 3 paragraph cope post about organized that’s extremely broad”
Member
Posts: 15,995
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 9 2026 02:02pm
“ChatGPT can you make me a 3 paragraph cope post about organized that’s extremely broad”


I can narrow it down for you if you have trouble focusing. But first tell us where you stand so that I don't just assume your religious "gender". There are soo many different kinds out there that its difficult to keep up.
Tell us what you believe in and which version is the right one?
Member
Posts: 7,152
Joined: Jul 22 2021
Gold: 990.00
Jan 9 2026 02:03pm
This just in, AI will tell you what you want to hear!
Member
Posts: 57,214
Joined: Oct 14 2010
Gold: 57,480.92
Jan 9 2026 02:05pm
Damn for real?
Gonna have to kick someone's butt over this devastating new revelation that affects me on a deep and personal level.
Member
Posts: 8,306
Joined: Oct 16 2006
Gold: 57.00
Jan 9 2026 02:09pm
I can narrow it down for you if you have trouble focusing. But first tell us where you stand so that I don't just assume your religious "gender". There are soo many different kinds out there that its difficult to keep up.
Tell us what you believe in and which version is the right one?


Google the apostles creed and read it. (Or in your case use chatGPT to find it for you)

You may even get lucky and have it resonate.
Member
Posts: 12,286
Joined: Jul 22 2007
Gold: 84.67
Warn: 10%
Jan 9 2026 03:03pm
Theres no lunacy like american catholicism. Trying to list examples is moot because everything pertaining to it is an example.

Perhaps if these people would actually follow the words of their doctrine instead of subverting it to enrich themselves, priest and follower alike, then the religion wouldnt be in the steep decline that it's in.

This post was edited by Sh00p on Jan 9 2026 03:03pm
Member
Posts: 3,241
Joined: Jan 14 2011
Gold: 230.00
Jan 9 2026 03:07pm
“ChatGPT can you make me a 3 paragraph cope post about organized that’s extremely broad”


this was 100% written by AI lmfao
Member
Posts: 15,995
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 9 2026 04:43pm
Google the apostles creed and read it. (Or in your case use chatGPT to find it for you)

You may even get lucky and have it resonate.


Just very brief look its main USP is that its a more basic version of Christianity which doesn't stress the importance of jesus's full divinity unlike the council of Necaea which expanded on the core understanding.
Otherwise you believe in literal jesus and all the magic as 100% to be real and not in metaphorical/allegorical sense of the word.

Would this be accurate representation of your beliefs?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
123267Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll