Lev. 20:13

BTW, I went and looked and found this.
"Distraught woman says ICE killed her wife in video after deadly Minneapolis shooting"

This post was edited by sirthom on Jan 8 2026 07:47am

her only "crime" is impeding ICE. who claim she blocked the road, even though in the video another car passes right by her and ICE could have just driven past. she's parked sideways but the road still is partially open.

an ICE officer (not police officer) jumped in front of her vehicle, then when she attempted to turn and drive around him he shot her dead, then shot a few more times for good measure.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jan 8 2026 07:41am

OK so, I am reading that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem described it as an “act of domestic terrorism” therefore labeling the dead woman as a terrorist, who, their words now, attempted to “weaponize her vehicle” and tried to kill the agents. I just do not see that in the video. I see someone trying to flee a scene (not a crime scene!) and being shot dead. Basically a walking while black moment, if that makes sense.

She was unarmed, not fleeing a crime scene, not threatening civilians, yet she was shot dead. I mean boy, that escalated quickly.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jan 8 2026 07:53am

Well if we actually enforced laws instead of trying to minimize harm from encounters on the misguided philosophy of letting people get away with escalatory behavior because arresting them could spark conflict- she harassed and stalked federal agents with a clear attempt to interfere in their duties and threaten them. A crime. She blocked the road when she saw them trying to extricate a vehicle, directly obstructing federal agents in their duties, a crime- they were trying to get a vehicle out of the snowbank and she saw it and parked her vehicle in front of them to block them. Then when approached by officers giving her commands, she tried to flee law enforcement and ignore commands, a crime. And she backed up her vehicle without any regard for bystanders or checking her blind spots, well more of a moving violation than a crime to be technical. She deserved a ticket and points on her license for that. Then when her vehicle was lined up with an officer she hit the gas and spun her tires several times, enough she would have run him down with traction. Assault with a deadly weapon.

This post was edited by Goomshill on Jan 8 2026 07:53am

She was a lesbo mud shark, so your story checks out.

really? does she really need to be shot dead for this ? do you really think she wanted to kill someone? why not simply pull a hand gun if she wants to kill someone? when i look at the videos it looks like she is trying to escape. we discussed this earlier, elsewhere, and sure from other angles it can be argued as you have outlined but is this really a fine moment of ICE ?

the more context I am getting the more stupid it reads. this story is being beamed all over the planet.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jan 8 2026 08:01am

kirby v duba 2008. she's not liable for the officer in front of her vehicle, he is.



basically yes. she's a criminal who tried to impede officers, terrorist is a big stretch.

Ok, she’s a criminal? Charged, Tried, and Conviction for some past offense? From what I’ve seen and read, she was just in the wrong place at the wrong time — a FAFO moment at most. Calling her a ‘dangerous criminal’ seems completely unfounded.

if we are speaking basic's I would say she was in the wrong place at the wrong time, she had a FAFO moment and the ICE response was disproportionate to the act. I think I need to leave this topic before I get mad, or worse, drive other people mad.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jan 8 2026 08:10am

Replacing law school students doing clerking with hallucinating AI has some funny impacts. Clark v Bowcutt 2018 in the 10th circuit said pretty much exactly the opposite, in circumstances mirroring this one. Kirby v Duva had them shooting at a stopped vehicle that they had not perceived as an imminent threat

The shooting of Michael Brown wouldn't have been justified if the cop disentangled himself, went home and had lunch and later set out and found Brown at his mommas home on the playstation eating doritos and popped him a dozen times. Bowcutt dealt with an officer standing in the path of a vehicle he was trying to stop as it did a 3 point turn and accelerated towards him, Duva dealt with officers surrounding a car and turning it into swiss cheese after the driver stopped resisting and idled it

This post was edited by Goomshill on Jan 8 2026 08:20am

Everyone knows what and how modern police are.
You roll the dice when they are around.
Your #1 defend to this is avoidance.
She went there intentionally with the intent to get in their way.
The events unfolded exactly as one would predict.
One could even claim cop assisted suicide.